Who will light the Olympic cauldron?

Faro

...
Joined
15 April 2008
Messages
1,658
Location
South Bucks
Visit site
But even if it's "how" it's lit - somebody has still got to be the last torchbearer, haven't they?

Nothing against Beckham, but I don't think he's the right person for the job. I personally WOULD like to see Sir Steve Redgrave do it, he well and truly deserves the honour - but I saw a TV interview with him late night night where he claimed that "no-one had phoned to ask him!" I hope he's telling porkies and that it IS him!
 

Maesfen

Extremely Old Nag!
Joined
20 June 2005
Messages
16,720
Location
Wynnstay - the Best!
photobucket.com
Whoever it is I hope they've given the honour to a very worthy person and it's done properly unlike the flag fiasco yesterday which was a diabolical unforgivable mistake.

Just seen above, please God no, not TB.
 

Slinkyunicorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 January 2009
Messages
45,409
Location
Should be working.....
www.rutlandhorseextras.co.uk
My moneys on David Beckham!

Why would it be?:confused:

He is NOT an OLYMPIAN and never has been there is a queue of Sportsmen and women ahead of him who have won Olymoic medals while exisiting and training for a year or more on what is probably less than a days money for huim:rolleyes:

Steve Redgrave should have the honour - he is GB's greatest living Olympian with 5 gold medals in 5 Olympics followed closely by Matthew Pinsent who has 4 gold medals in 4 Olympics then there is Daley Thompson, Chris Hoy etc etc

Their sporting achievements a superior to his in so many ways he shouldn't even be considered:mad:
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Really hope it isn't Beckham.

Won't be Wiggins because he is competing the next day and probably won't even be at the ceremony.

I'd like it to be Redgrave I think, but I don't think it will be surprising enough for the organisers. Apparently Roger Bannister is the bookies favourite.

I like the idea of it being one of the medalists from the 1948 games.

I don't understand why there is speculation that it might be William, it would seem a pretty illogical choice. If they want a Royal then we do have one who has competed at an olympics, has also been heavily involved in the Olympic movement for many years as both a representative on the International Olympic committee and LOCOG and is also a former president of the FEI. I don't for a minute think that they will have the Princess Royal light it though
 

quirky

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 January 2008
Messages
9,846
Location
Purdah
Visit site
But even if it's "how" it's lit - somebody has still got to be the last torchbearer, haven't they?

Yes, but what they're saying is it could be a complete unknown with the method of lighting being the spectacle, not the person doing it :)

Roger Bannister is who my money is on :)
 

galaxy

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 September 2006
Messages
5,959
Location
Bucks
Visit site
I'll be so cross if it's Beckham!! He's never won anything (or even been in a final!) at international level. OK, fairly successful at national level, but then plenty of people have been! They just aren't paid so much or live a celebrity lifestyle! sporting achievement wise he really is a nobody!

I think it should be Redgrave. But then it could be an unusual stunt!
 
Joined
10 March 2009
Messages
7,682
Visit site
Well Mohammed Ali is in town, although I know hes done it once and he is very frail.
What about one of the motor racing bods as theyve been doing well.?
I think it should be Joanna Lumley as Patsy !
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Steve Redgrave should have the honour - he is GB's greatest living Olympian with 5 gold medals in 5 Olympics followed closely by Matthew Pinsent who has 4 gold medals in 4 Olympics then there is Daley Thompson, Chris Hoy etc etc

Their sporting achievements a superior to his in so many ways he shouldn't even be considered:mad:

It has also been really bugging me that people keep saying that Bradley Wiggins/Chris Hoy are set to beat Steve Redgrave's record of 5 Olympic Golds this year. They are not. The point is that Steve Regrave went to 5 DIFFERENT olympic games and won a gold EVERY SINGLE YEAR - that is a huge span of time 1984 - 2000. Very few people would be capable of even getting to 5 successive games, nevermind winning a gold each time (and a bronze in '88). Add to that that he was battling Diabetes and you appreciate what a huge acheivement his is. He rowed in four different events at the olympics (coxed and coxless pairs and fours) and on both sides of the boat.

Wiggins and Hoy will only be at their 4th games this time. Hoy has 4 golds already and Wiggins just 3, the rest of their medals are of other colours.
 

Tillypup

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 January 2011
Messages
492
Location
Sudbury, Suffolk
www.valleypoint.co.uk
I love the fact that there are people around saying that Redgrave's achievements are not that great as he always rowed in crew boats!!!! Oh, of course he would have been completely along for the ride in the 2000 Olympics!!!;)

I have rowed a little bit and am in total awe at the amount of time and dedication he will have put in just to achieve one medal, never mind 5 consecutive medals!!! He's awesome and those that think just because he wasn't alone in the boat somehow make him less deserving of his accolades are mad!
 

Turitea

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 August 2007
Messages
996
Visit site
Steve Redgrave. All the others mentioned may or will have minor roles e.g. carrying the flame for a few metres or taking part in a display as centrepiece.
My guess.
 

FMM

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 April 2005
Messages
5,835
Location
Marlow
www.absolutelymad.co.uk
I agree. And I was slightly incensed (if that is possible) when it was suggested that rowing is "easier" than other sports. Ridiculous. AND whilst battling with diabetes!!!

We live in Marlow and were lucky enough to meet Steve Redgrave when he came to the main town park by the river on the day the torch didn't come through Marlow (bitter, moi? ... )

Anyway - they set up a small course in the park and all the primary school children who wanted to, made torches and ran round the course in relays - with Steve Redgrave and two other torch bearers. My son ended up with a special medal, a photo with Steve Redgrave, another with the Mayoress and pics of him holding the official torches as well. He didn't have to come along and spend several hours with the children, but he did - and that, added to the spectacular Olympic record he has makes him the ideal candidate.

As a town everyone is terribly proud of Steve Redgrave and everyone hopes that it will be he who will be chosen for this special honour.

Having said that, I wouldn't mind if it were Princess Anne either - to have competed in the Olympics and to have bred another who will be competing this year is a pretty good record!
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Yes I was amazed that people were suggesting that rowing is "easier" or that Regrave had somehow been "carried" by his team mates. I was fairly disgusted that one of those people was Daley Thompson who should know better. According to him only he, and Kelly Holmes are deserving of lighting the flame. :rolleyes:
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Of course one potentially surprising but EXTREMELY deserving and person who could light the flame would be Dame Tanni Grey Thompson..... The flame is equally relevant to the paralympics.
 

FMM

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 April 2005
Messages
5,835
Location
Marlow
www.absolutelymad.co.uk
Daley Thompson?!!! But he was the BEST at anything - just quite good at 10 different things ...

Other people who were fabulous at hurdles, for example, may have been even better than Daley but they concentrated on becoming the best at just one thing ... (and I don't really believe that, just cross that DT could have said something so stupid!)
 

galaxy

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 September 2006
Messages
5,959
Location
Bucks
Visit site
Rowing easy??? right.... ok.... I'll challenge anyone to get in a boat (prererable and single or double) and give it a go!

You not only have to be EXTREMELY fit (think marathon runner fit), but rowing actually takes a lot of skill and technique. One duff stroke and it's all over. To row in a crew in many ways is far harder then a single as you have to be EXTACTLY in sync to the nano second. If you are not, the boat slows down. There are very very few sports where that kind of team work is needed.

Redgrave is a wonderful guy. I have met him several times as a friend of mine rows for GB (and yes I will be a Dorney next week to cheer her on!! go Frances!!!).

(you may have guessed I used to row ;) At national level, but in crews at club level with people who row internationally)
 
Top