Will Connell diary of Peppermill events

juliehannah58

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 July 2005
Messages
1,793
Location
East Sussex
Visit site
I found this on the GBR website, makes interesting reading:

18th August
To say I’ve had an interesting day is an understatement. I’ll do my best to update you on the proceedings here but it has been an emotional time so you’ll have to excuse any “emotion” that creeps in. I wasn’t able to touch on the Peppermill withdrawal yesterday as it was an ongoing issue when I wrote my entry so couldn’t comment.

Early yesterday morning, we got the worrying news that Peppermill was stiff and tight across his back. The vets and physiotherapist set about getting him right and comfortable with a hope to him jumping in the evening. His blood tests didn’t show anything to cause concern but as the start time neared, it was clear he couldn’t jump on welfare grounds so I sought some advice on our best option. What came back was this; the combination should enter the arena, circle twice in front of fence one and eliminate themselves. Then they could jump in the second round. Now that didn’t really sit well with me. Firstly, the reason the horse was withdrawn was that he was not fit to jump and to put tack on him and canter into the arena would have potentially aggravated any condition and secondly, the whole concept of sending a horse into to ring only to be eliminated is little short of a farce. Imagine the reaction of television viewers around the world, the press would be in uproar and we’d look ridiculous. It was wrong for the sport, and wrong for the horse, so I made my decision to withdraw them.

Away from all of this, the three remaining combinations put up very solid performances to leave us in fourth equal. Nick, Tim and Ben were all very focused and determined to put the carry on behind them and ride to the best of their abilities so to finish within reach of a medal was heartening.

This morning, I approached the Ground Jury to see if John and Peppermill were able to jump tonight as he’d made a 100% recovery overnight and was told yes. Shortly after, there was an objection from seven of the nine nations involved – apparently on the basis that it was an unfair advantage as the horse would have been fresh having not jumped. Well, if I’d have done what was suggested, he wouldn’t have jumped a fence anyway (the farce continues). This protest was upheld by the Jury of Appeal so Peppermill was prevented from jumping. To say I’m annoyed is an understatement. It seems quite mad to allow a horse to enter an arena and eliminate itself as opposed to withdrawing. In my own mind, I stand by my decision as I know I did the right thing by the horse and, even more importantly, the sport. We’ll never know if this prevented us winning a medal but it has certainly had a negative effect on morale. To finish seventh is disappointing but by my calculations, all three riders are through to the individual final so we still have something to cheer about.

Meanwhile, rumours are abounding of a meeting involving the Dressage Ground Jury and other officials and some of the nations competing after the Grand Prix Special last night. Perhaps details will come out later...I feel like I’m writing a spy novel full of twists, turns, secrets and double dealing, not a sporting diary


Then yesterdays entry:
19th August
I was a person to be avoided this morning. It has to be said I was chewing glass, unamused, hacked off, however you want to put it. The night’s proceedings took every ounce of decorum from my being and tested me to my limits. Discussions have continued through the markets and back streets of Hong Kong about the rights and wrongs of what went on but the overwhelming feedback is that John was harshly treated. What went on before the start of the competition must not take any of the brilliance of the end of the competition. The battle between the old rivals America and Canada was fantastic – it made history as the first time there was a jump off for the gold medal and made for a great sporting spectacle. They were the deserving Gold and Silver medal winners but as for what the competition for the bronze could have been in different circumstances, we will never know. For ever more, there will be a nagging doubt in my mind to what might have been and sadly it will leave tarnish on my trip to Hong Kong. Perhaps, this matter is best closed with a line firmly drawn under it but we must all work to ensure the rules are clarified so no one suffers in the future. There it is, end of story, finito, cerrado, done and finished.

What do you think...?!
 

kerilli

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 April 2002
Messages
27,417
Location
Lovely Northamptonshire again!
Visit site
I think he was absolutely right not to take a horse with a problem and saddle it up and ask John to ride it into the arena and make it refuse twice at the first fence. That would have been farcical and embarrassing. The rules need clarifying/tightening up, definitely.
wasn't there a jump-off for gold last time, fwiw? i'm sure there was!
 

cefyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 May 2007
Messages
501
Location
Wales & USA
Visit site
Now are the IOC going to prevent all swimmers and track athletes from putting in their "lesser" runners for the qualifying heats then send in their top ones for the finals? Should be one rule for all sports under the IOC flag.
 

kerilli

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 April 2002
Messages
27,417
Location
Lovely Northamptonshire again!
Visit site
Hmm, and if riding hat manufacturers had to cover their logos (on Mary's hat, for e.g.), why are there Nike, Asics, Adidas etc etc logos all over the runners?
wink.gif
 

TarrSteps

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 January 2007
Messages
10,891
Location
Surrey
Visit site
They are right to be annoyed that they were told one thing then told another and the consequences were so huge. I am still amazed anyone on the Ground Jury thought the other teams WOULDN'T object.

I'm still a bit confused as to why, if the letter of the law had been upheld all along as it was in the end - once a horse is withdrawn, it's withdrawn - that would have changed things with regards to a medal. Everyone has said the horse would not have been ridden in the first round, regardless. So it would have been withdrawn and that would have been the end of it. VERY upsetting that it wasn't but it would have amounted to the same thing, no Peppermill in round two, wouldn't it? Or would they then have elected to ride the horse the first (second, actually) day, anyway . . ?

The business about relay teams is being discussed, particularly with swimming. There is a lot of annoyance over the Americans, particularly, constantly chopping and changing their line ups. I agree it should just be a team's a team - once you start you have to finish with the same people.
 

The Voice

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 June 2004
Messages
358
Visit site
It was wrong for the sport, and wrong for the horse, so I made my decision to withdraw them.


No matter how gutting the decision, this is what the Olympics is all about and different to other commercial events. Brave decision and I take my hat of to him for having the balls to do it. It would be nice if he got some kind of fair play award like they do in football from the FEI.
Unfortunatly the other teams have a point and you can't start changing rules otherwise where does it end and if we had got a medal then people would have said we cheated to get it. people may have said john was harshly treated but 7 out of 9 teams objected at the time.
 

The Voice

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 June 2004
Messages
358
Visit site
The British team who were tipped for a medal didn't put out there strongest team for the women's swimming relay and failed to qualify so it dosn't always work.

i think the difference is the number of events and individual has to do. Michael Phelps swam something like 30 events (and was eating 12,000 calories a day
shocked.gif
) which is an incredible effort.
 

Daffodil

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 April 2008
Messages
2,719
Visit site
It was absolutely absurd to think anyone could even consider saddling up and riding a horse that was unsound in any way, and contrive to get it eliminated at the first fence. If that had happened would he not have been eliminated from the entire competition, and as a result the Individual later? If so, the question of rejoining the competition in the next round is irrelevant. Or am I missing something in this saga? In the context of Olympic showjumping if a horse is unable to take part in the first element of the competition then it should remain unable to take part for the rest of the Games.
On equine welfare considerations this should be the case. Just think of the outcry if JW had been seen to be riding a lame horse to enable us to field a full team. We are on the way to making ourselves a laughing stock over this.

On the subject of crash hats, I thought the show jumpers hats from all nations looked AWFUL, as if some particularly big bird with poor digestion but a good aim had been targetting them.
 

TarrSteps

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 January 2007
Messages
10,891
Location
Surrey
Visit site
That is the questionable bit - an elimination in one round doesn't eliminate the horse from the whole competition. It effectively means the horse has no hope of getting into the Individual but if it happens in any of the Team rounds the horse can still jump the next day. I guess the thinking is it's not a welfare issue as there is no way of knowing why the horse was eliminated (perhaps an early start or a missed fence or similar). There have also been many instance where a horse has stopped out but come back the next class to jump around fine so even that situation is not cut and dried.

Interesting question would be a fall . . . if you fall xc you can't show jump so if you fall on the first round of the jumping should you be allowed to come back the next day . . . ? Ah, what a tangled web!
 

lucretia

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 January 2008
Messages
4,829
Visit site
the only thing that is quite clear is that hteir were people representing the interests of the british team who failed to grasp the rules of that particular sport.
the ground jury have not made a statement eoither and if will connell is to be believed those officials did not know the rules either which seems to me beyond the bounds of credibility and no wonder the other teams objected.
 

viewfromahill

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 March 2008
Messages
253
Visit site
What a complete shambles the whole thing is IMO that is!!!
This wasnt a local one day aff show this was the Olympics and Team GB know the rules, same as not letting our best 100m runner go to the Olympics he knew the rules when he broke them!! If the gossip is to be believed and I am sure we will never know - would be best to take your best and soundest horses really! Would it really have hurt the horse to ride in the ring (at walk dont see it needed to be canter) and back out as it made such a miraculous recovery for R2!!! But surely questions need to be asked and answered and changes made?
 
Top