Recent content by wallace

[ QUOTE ] thank you - I was pleased with them but they weren't very 'me' - I want to try harder this year but I may have to get up very, very early to do one of my ideas [/ QUOTE ] Are you planning on a Frankie Dettori style victory dismount? Or have I spoiled it now?

[ QUOTE ] Shamelessly giving this a BUMP [/ QUOTE ] What an odd thing to do!

[ QUOTE ] Because the world is fluffy and pink and wonderful [/ QUOTE ] Lord knows why I have wandered in here but the thread title showed up in the list of topics. Coupled with the name of the forum member I felt compelled to look, and I have to agree...The title of the thread alone...

I think Skiddaw Lad should be consulted. Apparently he has managed this several times - once with witnesses.

Did Ernie Wise have any input?

So you think hypocrisy is their GREATEST sin?

Well, how dreadful! Was it you? It was, wasn't it? I actually don't think it's earth-shatteringly important to use 100% flawless language/grammar/spelling or punctuation as long as you can make yourself understood and don't resort to lazy txt spk. Mistakes and typos are understandable, but...

I think the dedication required to log in and out as separate identities and argue with oneself is to be admired. or he could have two computers on the go, with different IP addresses etc. In any case - a worthy effort.

Only for pinkoe liberals and tree-hugger types. For a great many, normal, forward thinking daytime radio phone-in jocks, popular TV presenters with a no-nonsense attitude to political correctness and tabloid columnists (or even Fifth columnists) who perpetually claim that the we are all off to...

"I've just had a look at your profile." Oooh! How exciting! "I bet you and Gary Glitter make a fine pair." The whole e-mail address is, "swing@garryglitter.com" and is a very old in-joke aimed at another stalkerish weirdo who used to like examining people's profiles. He used the name "swing"...

"Its always good when you know your limitations. Your must be greater than most." The limitations I mentioned being the hours in the day and infinity..... OK I will admit to "knowing" those limitations. Well done for making yourself look a tit. "You should seriously consider getting that...

But you never answer any. I've asked you lots. You are possibly my all-time favourite Hunting Forum poster but I would appreciate some answers.

Exactly! It is good to know that there are some people with a modicum of wit and intelligence in here to contrast the back-slapping brown-nosers who have nothing to say other than to congratulate someone for a frankly lame post - thereby making their own post even more tragic!

Who might "us" be? Have you joined a club, or started one with yourself? And no - it would be a very wearisome waste of time "trying to tell you something". There just aren't enough hours in the day, or infinity come to think of it.... Anyway, I asked first! Please answer my question first...

Skidsy! Nice to see you back. Now forget all this hunting malarkey - why has your avatar got a picture of a dog, then a picture of a dogless head above it - and the head is out of proportion to the main picture? Is it a surrealist piece called, "This is not a dog ", only written in French?