A wwyd.. backing a 3yr old

Faracat, I agree with you as it depends on what the horse is doing. And it's another interesting point all of it's own! For instance I get a lot of very concerned buyers worrying if the horse can carry 13 stone - which is really no biggie. Not if you consider what horses are designed to do and used to do.

On that subject a farmer friend spoke about this. He said their old Irish draught, his grandfather's horse, on a Sunday he took the family to mass - a round trip of 30 miles at 8am. Then the horse was taken out from under the trap and took his grand-dad hunting for the day. And this was routine, and now there are buyers wondering will the horse stand up to carrrying 13 stone for hacking - faintly ludicrous given the breed's history.

As your friend pointed out, it's true horses don't mature til later and fair enough, he chose not to break til five. He was an expert, but so much depends on what the horse is destined to do and in whose hands he is. For instance carriage horses took years to train, I think something like four years, it was an absolutely expert field.

Today I know people ruining horses at three - without ever backing them. I know of a fab mare who was such a good jumper her owner pushed her to win all the loose jumping competitions in her age category as he thought he would then sell for a big price. The poor mare just stopped jumping, very understandably as she was pushed too far.

The whole point is I suppose, that a real expert horseman can really understand his horse and won't ask more than they can give. As an example the same man with the stallion I mentioned above; now this man has about 70 horses producing top sport horses (like nations cup) and NH horses, told me that he has a mare who is better than anything he ever had. But she's tense so she won't just jump on demand. He said he will give her all the time in the world "and maybe she'll be eight when she drops it or maybe she never will". He has the expertise to understand her and her issues but most hobby riders don't.
 
Oh golly yes people really can ruin horses so fast. I have had such a heartbreaking situation happen recently where someone did that. They took that most wonderful Sec D filly and just destroyed her mentally without ever sitting on her. She was rehomed but sadly it turned out to be a case of out of the frying pan and into the fire (although it was hard to tell that in advance). I still feel that maybe I should have taken her on, but I'm waiting for an operation at the moment and just not up to taking on such a case.

I agree that real horsemen/women have such a feel for their horses. It's something to aspire to.
 
Ex racers are normally sat on at eighteen months old, it can't be compared with backing a three year old.

There is also the possibility that stressing a spine before the growth plates are sealed actually causes a stronger spine more capable of long term work with a ride on board.

We need research.

Some concussive stress has been shown to be useful in limbs but I would have thought that the stresses on the spine when ridden, are quite different?
 
Oh golly yes people really can ruin horses so fast. I have had such a heartbreaking situation happen recently where someone did that. They took that most wonderful Sec D filly and just destroyed her mentally without ever sitting on her. She was rehomed but sadly it turned out to be a case of out of the frying pan and into the fire (although it was hard to tell that in advance). I still feel that maybe I should have taken her on, but I'm waiting for an operation at the moment and just not up to taking on such a case.

I agree that real horsemen/women have such a feel for their horses. It's something to aspire to.

I'm sure you have a great feel for horses yourself and would have been great for that mare if you had a chance with her.

I suppose what I'm amazed by doing this job as an agent is just the incredible level of knowledge some horse people have - and that they are completely oblivious to! They have no idea themselves of how far ahead they are with their own expertise. Like that man with the stallion. I was taken aback recently when he just mentioned in passing that he could spot a wind problem in a horse within 30 seconds, just by looking at the horse's coat.

He has no need of vets when buying, as he already knows and can spot problems faster than most equine vets - to me it's just mind boggling! But it also bears out the old breeding analogy. This same man is from generations of producers and horse dealers. In times gone by his family supplied horses to the British cavalry, now they do to show jumpers and eventers. He's the product of his background as well as just being very sympathetic to the horse standing in front of him.

Recently we were stood in a field of 40 two and three year olds and he was predicting what each horse would go on to do. Out of the whole lot there was only one youngster he said he wasn't keen on breaking because the horse was trying to dominate the others and never tried to make a connection with the humans as the others did. I asked him why wouldn't he just sell him and save himself the hassle to which he replied "one of us will be leaving the yard in box" and he had no intention of it being him!

http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/clas...4&query=quality+irish+horses&price__unit=4831
 
OP you certainly have opened the floodgates here!

Some brilliant advice and ultimately I think the one thing we can all agree on is you know the horse best, and therefore you are best placed to know 'when' is right to back the horse.

But a lot of your question wasnt actually about the 'when', it was about the 'how' - and I know that feeling very well, as I have my first youngster (ridden & worked with lots but never owned one, so bought a yearling 2 years ago). He turned 3 early May, and it has been on my mind ever since how I'm going to back him, when should it be, should I send him away....the list goes on! I have gradually come to the conclusion that I dont want to send him away, purely because I've had him so long I would hate to not be a part of the process. Going once a week isnt enough for me, as I have taught him everything so far it would be a huge shame and I know I'd regret it. Can I find anyone to come to me and do it (at the yard)? No! That's like trying to find hen's teeth! I do know of one person but then a friend at the yard had to sell a horse he broke for her, because he made the horse 'his' if that makes sense, his aids were clearly quite different to hers and she is an incredible rider (wont say how old but lets just say over 60 so has plenty of experience) and trains with Carl H so she knows what she's doing! To have him ruin what should have been a lovely horse has put me off to be honest, I'd be gutted if that happened to me as my boy is my forever horse.

So I've ruled out sending away, ruled out getting the only person I've come across to back him as the guy isnt ideal....so that doesnt leave me with much choice! So I will be backing him myself, hence serious dieting time for me (I will learn to love salad!). He's had tack on, walked around in his tack, and we do a bit of in-hand stuff and general practicing things like standing at the mounting block etc. But over the last few months he's turned into a bit of an idiot to be honest, very spooky & tense for no real reason so he's clearly away with the fairies at the moment so I've decided he's just not ready for anything more just now. In a month or so I might have a little lean over, and maybe even a walk around - but I doubt it will be anything more. If I can manage to have a little walk and trot before Xmas I'll be happy with that, then he'll be left alone over winter and when the clocks go forward in spring that is when I'll start properly, so he'll be almost 4 by then. And by properly I just mean getting him ridden away before we then spend all of our time making the most of our wonderful hacking on the bridleways around the hills by the yard. Proper schooling and competing probably wont be until he's 5.

Use your own judgement on whether the horse is ready or not, and most importantly ignore anyone at your yard that tries to tell you to hurry up with it. I know the pressure, I get asked all the time. One stupid woman spotted my saddle the other day and was asking if I'd ridden him yet, he'd only had the saddle on once and she'd expected me to have jumped on and gone for a ride! Leaving it longer is unlikely to do any damage, but equally if you think the horse will cope with a little bit of walking about now then that isnt likely to hurt either.

If you have decided to send the horse away, just make sure you visit lots and the person comes well recommended, I've seen & heard so many horror stories even ones that were sent away at 4 or older....so you just need to choose carefully. If you are experienced enough there is no reason you couldn't do this yourself if you have supervision from a trusted friend/trainer and a helper on the ground.

Good luck!
 
Obviously each horse is it's own person, so the degree of work the horse can physically and/or mentally take will differ greatly.

I personally aim to have mine broken in and riding for the end of their 3rd yr. I usually like them to be having a go at jumping 4yo classes and a few BNs at the middle of their 4th yr. I understand some people don't agree with this and I appreciate other peoples views but that's the aim with my horses.

I now buy and have bought my last 3 horses off the same guy, who brings them across pretty much untouched they have just started wearing headcollars and I love having them like that. They have had best wedge of 3yrs out to be a horse and I think it gives them a brilliant brain when they come in and you ask questions as they seem to want to know better than a horse that has been handled from being a foal in my experience. My first lot of horses off said guy (Now a 5yo) was so easy to do, if I wanted to rush her she could of been 'done' in a matter of weeks, but she was so big we took our time with her and gave her lots of down time until she was 4.5 and she just came out and jumped like she's been doing it her whole life, and has been easy to do ever since that day. The 2nd horse (My now 4yo) was always much flightier and full on, however now he's under saddle, despite being as sharp as a knife is a very easy horse to work with and has an incredible brain.

Time scale depends on the horse but if being produced properly and doing light work and hacking at 3.5 I really don't see the issue.
 
Some concussive stress has been shown to be useful in limbs but I would have thought that the stresses on the spine when ridden, are quite different?

The research was into limbs and yes it clearly showed that early starting gave the horses stronger bones .
The thing with backs is that muscle development on the top line and the abdomen is the key to a strong back .
That's very driven by conformation and the skill of the person doing the training .
Weak backed horses will need careful training whatever age you do it .
 
I have a 4 year old that i have backed on my own all summer we are now we are hacking lightly and I will tick her over till next year turn her away for Dec, Jan Feb then bring her back in in March she will only be 5 at the end of April. I think if you can do it slowly and quietly the better they will be and you dont want her to break. Just carry on as you are and you will be fine!!
 
The research was into limbs and yes it clearly showed that early starting gave the horses stronger bones .
The thing with backs is that muscle development on the top line and the abdomen is the key to a strong back .
That's very driven by conformation and the skill of the person doing the training .
Weak backed horses will need careful training whatever age you do it .

Do you have a link to this research? I'd love to read it.
 
Do you have a link to this research? I'd love to read it.

I think they did it at Glasgow uni the horses used where Tb's getting ready for or going in training .
But it's no surprise because it's well know that concussion increases bone density but clearly there's lots more to keeping horses sound than that bone density .
 
Some concussive stress has been shown to be useful in limbs but I would have thought that the stresses on the spine when ridden, are quite different?

Completely different. But that doesn't mean that it wouldn't be beneficial to mildly stress a three year old's back.

Time and again nature shows a stronger result if a system is placed under an appropriate level of stress.

Stress in this context should not be read as the negative way in which we normally use it, but in an engineering sense.

It would be pretty easy to research this, but there is no money in knowing the result, which is, I guess, why it hasn't been done.
 
I found this one, but one group were exercised on a treadmill and the second group were walked out in-hand. None were ridden.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10659317

I don't know if anyone has access to the whole paper and can give us more detail? The abstract certainly doesn't seem to say that the greater bone density is actually a good thing.

Stress fractures of the distal condyles of the McIII are common in Thoroughbred racehorses. We propose that excess stiffening within the condyles due to extensive new bone formation may lead to concentration of strain at the condylar grooves and incipient cracking through calcified cartilage and into the subchondral bone.

This one about stabling, stabling with exercise and full turnout of foals is an interesting read too.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100207/

Dr Bennett has stated that people saying that race training is good for horses bones is a misapplication of good research.

http://www.equinestudies.org/ranger_2008/ranger_piece_2008_pdf1.pdf Go to the bottom of page two and onto page three for the relevant section.

I know that the oft quoted 'Ranger' piece is an article, but I have been told that research behind it is sound.
 
So basically... since we cannot provide hundreds of acres of wild turnout for the horse to condition itself, we must provide that through managed stressing of the physiology...

It does make sense. The old books were right.
 
Slow gently imperceptible transitions from one stage of training to the next, avoiding over facing the horse at each step.

Throw the calendar away and your clock with it and train the horse at a pace it is comfortable with! Are you really going to ride a 3yo so hard that it's bones will be damaged?

That's exactly how I feel. My filly is two, and we're just taking things nice and easy - I definitely won't put my weight on her back for at least another year, but when I do I want it to seem perfectly natural. I'm not going to set a date for "breaking her in", and I have no intention on going all cowboy on her! One baby step at a time, when she's ready and happy for it. I'm in no rush! She loves going for mini expeditions around the yard, so we have lots of nice walks in-hand to look forward to in the meantime.
 
Top