be positive
Well-Known Member
It amazes me that some posters (and presumably potential horse buyers) don't understand that The Sale of Goods Act covers horse sales, which by law are treated just like an inanimate object, as far as being 'fit for purpose' is concerned.
It is just not clear enough though and can be misinterpreted, most people are taking the fact a horse passes a vetting as proof it was fit for purpose at the time of sale without taking into account that a vetting is limited and to an extent can be manipulated if the horse is drugged or in some way set up to "pass" there are many things that can be done to help a slightly unsound horse feel good on the day.
I think in the case in the OP it is very likely the condition was preexisting and the dealer will have to refund and that it should be far easier to get the refund than it will probably prove to be, it certainly should not end up in court if the facts are as clear as the OP has stated.