Advice needed on returning a horse to a dealer

Upthecreek

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 May 2019
Messages
2,624
Visit site
What exercise are you doing with the horse? You said it could not be lunged or ridden at the vetting as not broken.
 

SEL

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2016
Messages
12,493
Location
Buckinghamshire
Visit site
Given it took 4 months , multiple vet visits, 2 camera scopes and a 2nd opinion to get to the root of my pony's breathing issues then I can see how a vet could miss the problem in a one-off visit.

Still the horse you bought isn't fit for purpose though so I'd be trying the legal route
 

Floralaura

New User
Joined
1 May 2021
Messages
8
Visit site
What exercise are you doing with the horse? You said it could not be lunged or ridden at the vetting as not broken.
None, just out in small paddock. We have lunged the horse probably 6 times, had to teach him to lunge, but it's almost cruel to do it as he just can't breathe.
 

Floralaura

New User
Joined
1 May 2021
Messages
8
Visit site
Given it took 4 months , multiple vet visits, 2 camera scopes and a 2nd opinion to get to the root of my pony's breathing issues then I can see how a vet could miss the problem in a one-off visit.

Still the horse you bought isn't fit for purpose though so I'd be trying the legal route
This one makes such a noise you could be the other end of the arena and still hear it.
 

stormox

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 May 2012
Messages
3,280
Location
midlands
Visit site
Have you had the horse scoped? Is it laryngeal paralysis or some other problem? If its an infection or allergy it probably could have come overnight.
 

smiggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 February 2008
Messages
691
Visit site
What do your vets think re onset ?
would they back you in a claim that was pre exsisting condition, in which case a claim against the vetting vets might be the way forward if dealer adamant wasn’t an issue .
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
57,220
Visit site
On sellers recommendation stupidly.

Ach, what a mess, I can practically hear you kicking yourself but we all make mistakes.

I would have expected a vetting of a three year old to include having it either lunged or run round the arena or a round pen loose to asses heart function, lameness, whether the action was fit for the intended use and breathing. I think your best bet might be to claim against the vet for not doing a full vetting, but I think you need the advice of an equine solicitor.
.
 

blitznbobs

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 June 2010
Messages
6,308
Location
Cheshire
Visit site
Nerve damage can happen at any time — you are probably on a fairly sticky wicket when it comes to the legality of this. The vet you appointed (recommended by the seller or not) aka ‘an expert’ said the horse was sound and fit for purpose. This is pretty much proof in the court system that the horse was damaged on your watch. Youd have to go along the route of fraud / negligence by the vet which would give you a case against the vet but not the owner, or that they colluded to deceive you which is fraud and as this is criminal, needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt... which would give you recourse on both. The consumers rights act would not apply in a business to business transaction and you had someone inspect ‘the goods’ as your specialist advisor (vet) prior to they being sent to you which )even if you werent a business ) scuppers the distance selling rights (which also do not apply to businesses) all in all its probably time to cut your losses.
 

VRIN

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 February 2008
Messages
2,534
Visit site
You are unlikely to have recourse against the vet as its only a snapshot on the day of the vetting. However if he/she said they 'missed' it on a horse they bought themselves you may be able to suggest they are not competent to vet a horse. if its a dealer you can ask for a full refund within 30 days of purchase as it is not of satisfactory quality under the Sale of Goods act
 

blitznbobs

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 June 2010
Messages
6,308
Location
Cheshire
Visit site
You are unlikely to have recourse against the vet as its only a snapshot on the day of the vetting. However if he/she said they 'missed' it on a horse they bought themselves you may be able to suggest they are not competent to vet a horse. if its a dealer you can ask for a full refund within 30 days of purchase as it is not of satisfactory quality under the Sale of Goods act
sales of goods act is gone... it’s superceded by the consumer rights act and doesn’t cover business to business transactions
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
As the OP is a dealer of some kind, saying she bought the horse to sell on, this does mean she cannot use small claims court I believe and also that the rights are different to a private buyer......please correct me if Im wrong but I took a dealwr to amall claims court and Im sure I was asked if I was a private buyer.

You are wrong. The small claims court can be used by businesses and private individuals.

Your status as a private buyer does make a difference to the laws that apply.
 

Kaylum

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 May 2010
Messages
5,358
Visit site
I would have a word with the vet that did the vetting. Make sure they are fully registered and ask for the vets report. Good vets will not touch dodgy dealers. There are some vets who aren't vets and aren't registered but nobody bothers checking up on them. My friend had this happen to her. A new vet came to the area he started his practice he was not actually a vet. He got found out but only after he had done lots of damage and had put healthy animals to sleep. Another thing to do is put a post about your horse on Facebook horse groups it's surprising now many people will private message you about what's happened and that they know of the horse etc.
 

ihatework

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 September 2004
Messages
21,557
Visit site
Well you need legal advice, but my non legal thoughts are:

I can see how a vet would miss it in an unbacked 3yo just loose in the school for the vetting. But that doesn’t absolve them completely - a paralysis on scope is pretty cut and dried. It doesn’t just happen overnight, but can become more obvious over time.

Anyway, I think that’s pretty irrelevant.

The crux of it is a wind issue, undeclared (even if dealer genuinely didn’t know), is a very valid reason to reject a horse. I’d just start court proceedings against the dealer given you are within a reasonable time from purchase.
 

The Jokers Girl

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 July 2017
Messages
321
Visit site
No advise to the original OP but can anyone explain how a horse passes a 5 stage vetting when it can't be ridden or lunged, as certain aspects of a 5 stage need ridden work and/or lunging etc.
Would this horse that was not trained to lunge and was unbacked only realistically been able to be 2 stage vetted?
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
57,220
Visit site
No advise to the original OP but can anyone explain how a horse passes a 5 stage vetting when it can't be ridden or lunged, as certain aspects of a 5 stage need ridden work and/or lunging etc.
Would this horse that was not trained to lunge and was unbacked only realistically been able to be 2 stage vetted?


That's my view, and if a five stage was offered and charged for I think there's a case against the vet. There are a lot of checks done at or after speed work.

I'm NOT a suing person, but something has gone wrong here.
.
 

The Jokers Girl

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 July 2017
Messages
321
Visit site
That's my view, and if a five stage was offered and charged for I think there's a case against the vet. There are a lot of checks done at or after speed work.

I'm NOT a suing person, but something has gone wrong here.
.
Thanks ycbm, not just me finding that odd then.
 

Errin Paddywack

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 June 2019
Messages
6,266
Location
West Midlands
Visit site
That's my view, and if a five stage was offered and charged for I think there's a case against the vet. There are a lot of checks done at or after speed work.
When my colt was put forward for stallion approval with the breed society he had to undergo a pretty full vetting including fast work on the lunge. The vet thought he could hear a whistle so I had to make my boy gallop as fast as possible on the lunge. He was 2.5 yrs. That would not have shown up just running loose in the arena. He was scoped and passed. I never heard him whistle then or in the future. It does not sound to me as though the vet did a full 5 stage vetting in this case.
 

Upthecreek

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 May 2019
Messages
2,624
Visit site
No advise to the original OP but can anyone explain how a horse passes a 5 stage vetting when it can't be ridden or lunged, as certain aspects of a 5 stage need ridden work and/or lunging etc.
Would this horse that was not trained to lunge and was unbacked only realistically been able to be 2 stage vetted?

That’s why I asked the question about what exercise the horse had been having after purchase if it couldn’t be lunged or ridden for the vetting. I don’t see how the horse could ‘pass’ a 5 stage vetting with these elements being missed out. If the horse could not be ridden or lunged what was it doing in the videos the buyer saw pre-purchase?
 

Kaylum

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 May 2010
Messages
5,358
Visit site
What was the name of the vet?

Get yourself on here https://www.rcvs.org.uk/registration/check-the-register/ see if they are registered and if they are take it further with the practice.

If not they will be in serious trouble for impersonating a vet.

What was the vetting for, what sort of horse did you ask the vet to do the vetting for? Ridden? Non Ridden? They have to advise if it is suitable for the reason your purchasing the horse.
 
Last edited:

Fred66

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 February 2017
Messages
2,731
Visit site
No advise to the original OP but can anyone explain how a horse passes a 5 stage vetting when it can't be ridden or lunged, as certain aspects of a 5 stage need ridden work and/or lunging etc.
Would this horse that was not trained to lunge and was unbacked only realistically been able to be 2 stage vetted?
A 5 stage vetting can be performed on an unbroken horse but the ridden phase is replaced by lunging.
 

The Jokers Girl

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 July 2017
Messages
321
Visit site
A 5 stage vetting can be performed on an unbroken horse but the ridden phase is replaced by lunging.
I understand that, which was why I put " as certain aspects of the 5 stage need ridden work and/ or lunging" but my query was how has this horse legitimately been 5 stage vetted when no ridden work or lunging were carried out. Although I think YCBM has hit the nail on the head in her reply to my post.

The OP has said at time of vetting horse was not trained to lunge nor had it been backed and neither of these could be done at vetting
 

Fred66

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 February 2017
Messages
2,731
Visit site
I understand that, which was why I put " as certain aspects of the 5 stage need ridden work and/ or lunging" but my query was how has this horse legitimately been 5 stage vetted when no ridden work or lunging were carried out. Although I think YCBM has hit the nail on the head in her reply to my post.

The OP has said at time of vetting horse was not trained to lunge nor had it been backed and neither of these could be done at vetting
Sorry should have said they can also be loose schooled as an alternate to lunging.
Unless OP believes that the pre-purchase vet didn’t do the test thoroughly and has sufficient evidence to prove this then as it is a trade to trade transaction I think it unlikely they will win a legal case.
However the insurance may cover her as she had the pre-purchase vetting that did show any signs of the illness and if the insurers believe it did exist at time of purchase and won’t payout then OP might be able to get her insurers to instigate proceedings against the vet.
 
Top