Bluebelle666
Well-Known Member
I have had my loan horse for a year now. I brought her back into work after a previous injury and have worked hard to get her to be the fit, healthy, allrounder horse that she is today (well New years Eve anyway).
Around 4 months ago the owner informed me that she planned to sell her and someone would be coming to view her in a few days. That person never viewed, however it did push me to decide that I wanted my own horse so that someone could not take away at 2 days notice.
In December I nearly bought a filly (it failed on the vetting), I informed the owner and said I was happy to give 4 weeks notice, the owner went mental and told me she was taking her that weekend. She then changed her mind and as the filly failed her vetting it was decided that I would keep Blondie until she was either sold or I found my own horse.
Unfortunately on New Years day Blondie came in from the field lame. I informed the owner who requested she be turned out as normal for 2 weeks which I did, she's still lame so she requested that she go on box rest. The owner does not want the vet calling out. No heat in the leg, the problem appears to be in her shoulder. The owner has not been to see her in 6 months.
That brings me to today. I have viewed and put down a deposit on a mare. I have contacted the owner and said that I will give her 4 weeks notice. The owner has again gone mental, she now states that it is my fault her horse is lame, that in the 3 weeks she has been lame there have been 3 people wanting to buy her and because of the lameness she cannot sell her. So it is therefore my fault she cannot sell her.
She has said that I have to take responsibility for the lameness and keep her until she is again fit and the owner has sold her.
Am I being unfair with the 4 weeks notice?
Or is she being unfair asking me to keep her horse until she is again fit and sold?
What should of been a very exciting day has now upset me
Around 4 months ago the owner informed me that she planned to sell her and someone would be coming to view her in a few days. That person never viewed, however it did push me to decide that I wanted my own horse so that someone could not take away at 2 days notice.
In December I nearly bought a filly (it failed on the vetting), I informed the owner and said I was happy to give 4 weeks notice, the owner went mental and told me she was taking her that weekend. She then changed her mind and as the filly failed her vetting it was decided that I would keep Blondie until she was either sold or I found my own horse.
Unfortunately on New Years day Blondie came in from the field lame. I informed the owner who requested she be turned out as normal for 2 weeks which I did, she's still lame so she requested that she go on box rest. The owner does not want the vet calling out. No heat in the leg, the problem appears to be in her shoulder. The owner has not been to see her in 6 months.
That brings me to today. I have viewed and put down a deposit on a mare. I have contacted the owner and said that I will give her 4 weeks notice. The owner has again gone mental, she now states that it is my fault her horse is lame, that in the 3 weeks she has been lame there have been 3 people wanting to buy her and because of the lameness she cannot sell her. So it is therefore my fault she cannot sell her.
She has said that I have to take responsibility for the lameness and keep her until she is again fit and the owner has sold her.
Am I being unfair with the 4 weeks notice?
Or is she being unfair asking me to keep her horse until she is again fit and sold?
What should of been a very exciting day has now upset me