MiLeTa
Well-Known Member
When my boy had the xrays done that diagnosed his hock arthritis, the vet also took xrays of his stifles and said that they did not look brilliant and that they would probably need treatment. The original plan was to treat the hocks, see how he goes, and then treat the stifles at a later date.
He has been on painkillers to help him through until treatment, which have seemed to help him day-to-day (he's quite happy mucking around in the field), but still seems a bit sore when I take him in the school. I have been doing only inhand work with him as he is also quite sore in his back, which does not seem to have been improved by the painkillers. Due to this, I decided to get his stifles treated at the same time as his hocks (he will be having Arthrimid in all four joints) as my thinking was that I want to try to give his back the best chance I can to sort itself out (if that makes sense?). He also doesn't box rest brilliantly, so thought one lot would be less stressful for both of us than two.
The other reason for getting both done at the same time is that I will be moving yards in July. The new place should be a lot better for him (loads more turnout, and considerably better hacking with some nice hills- where we are now is all flat roads), but isn't quite as good if he needs box rest.
Having said all this, I'm now a bit worried that I may have jumped the gun on the stifles? To me they look like they do need treatment, but my vet seemed a bit surprised when I said that I wanted to do them at the same time as the hocks, although that could have been because of the change of plan. I do have other images of his stifles if these are the wrong ones to judge by, and have xrays of his hocks if people would like to see those as well.
I think I am just looking for some reassurance that I'm going down the right treatment path, really, as I've now got to a place where I am second-guessing myself, and if I'm not doing the right thing, there's still time to change plan!
He has been on painkillers to help him through until treatment, which have seemed to help him day-to-day (he's quite happy mucking around in the field), but still seems a bit sore when I take him in the school. I have been doing only inhand work with him as he is also quite sore in his back, which does not seem to have been improved by the painkillers. Due to this, I decided to get his stifles treated at the same time as his hocks (he will be having Arthrimid in all four joints) as my thinking was that I want to try to give his back the best chance I can to sort itself out (if that makes sense?). He also doesn't box rest brilliantly, so thought one lot would be less stressful for both of us than two.
The other reason for getting both done at the same time is that I will be moving yards in July. The new place should be a lot better for him (loads more turnout, and considerably better hacking with some nice hills- where we are now is all flat roads), but isn't quite as good if he needs box rest.
Having said all this, I'm now a bit worried that I may have jumped the gun on the stifles? To me they look like they do need treatment, but my vet seemed a bit surprised when I said that I wanted to do them at the same time as the hocks, although that could have been because of the change of plan. I do have other images of his stifles if these are the wrong ones to judge by, and have xrays of his hocks if people would like to see those as well.
I think I am just looking for some reassurance that I'm going down the right treatment path, really, as I've now got to a place where I am second-guessing myself, and if I'm not doing the right thing, there's still time to change plan!