cptrayes
Well-Known Member
To have personal experience of whether diagnostic tools are able to uncover more lamenesses than previously you would have to be about 200 years old and have followed a few hundred thousand horses over those years. I am neither 200 years old nor have met that many horses but it is reasonable to assume that neither are you. What is also reasonable to assume though is that massive diagnostic technical advances ranging from x-rays to scintigraphy and MRIs have given us a vastly different insight into horse injuries simply because of the advanced capabilities of these diagnostic tools. That was my point.
Your point is well made, but that was not the point we were discussing. No-one disputes that there are wonderful techiniques now available to identify why a horse is lame. The point was that the vast majority of horses which are lame recover spontaneously with or without those techniques being used.