He used to. His work (in my understanding) is also based on domination to use his own word.I like that a lot, thanks for posting Andy.
I think he starts with work on the line, and in an enclosed area called a picadaro. (Not sure if I've spelt that right). I think he uses quite a long line, and it's draped around the neck rather than attached to a halter on the horse's head.
That's what I meant Tinypony. I don't really see a relevance in using the word cheating myself. What does cheating mean fburton? is the question I should ask.What do you mean Amanda? If we leave them to their own devices then I guess we'd have to stop handling them and definitely riding them? What's the difference between cheating and training?
Amandap - Please don't read too much significance into the word "cheating"!That's what I meant Tinypony. I don't really see a relevance in using the word cheating myself. What does cheating mean fburton? is the question I should ask.
Surely we hope to make things easier for us and the horse whether we use some form of restraint or lure or a combination. For me it's how all this stuff is applied that makes the difference...
Fair enough. To me cheating implies unfair but I see what you mean now.Amandap - Please don't read too much significance into the word "cheating"!I'm all for cheating if it helps the trainer and the horse.
Francis
I have learned that many people mean force and coersion when they talk about dominance in relation to human/horse interaction...As for domination and/or dominance - what a trainer says he or she does doesn't necessarily conform to other people's ideas of the same. We still don't have a common set of terms whose meaning we all agree on.
Great.I'm glad you posted this because I had a play with some of the ideas that I think KFH uses, as I say, can't afford to go to his courses, so I'm working with his book and a DVD. I have a gelding who is quite into people, and played around with the idea of groundwork using a 22ft line around his neck. I was quite pleased with the way he responded.
That's great to hear, Andy - working with horses who are free to stay or leave is a good indicator of how much they are enjoying the work, and makes one really aware of regulating one's body language signals - esp. what is "too loud/pushy"!I agree with the concept of benevolent leadership and have done some work with my horse in the field, at liberty where she has the choice to remain or leave as she wishes. This I feel gives me a measure to judge when my insistence in performing the task may be perceived as dominant behaviour, through becoming task oriented myself and enables me to keep balanced in my approach in order to keep her with me and interested. Early days yet though.
Somewhat off on a tangent (again)... Does anyone know where I can find video clips of horses displaying leadership?I believe that mares are the only horses that display leadership within a natural herd situation whereas other mares and stallions are dominant to a greater or lesser extent.
I used to do this with the horses and ponies at Garscube Estate in Glasgow (part of the Vet School), many years ago before they turned the grazing into athletics grounds. Often it would start with just one horse following quietly, and then I'd become more energetic and the others would join in until all 8 or 9 were running after me, wheeling in big arcs and kicking up their heels. Definitely play mode, not flight. In this case, this particular field was overlooked, by the the Beatson Research Institute, and on one occasion I noticed that I had a small audience at one window. They must have wondered what on earth I was doing.It's fun to experiment with the effect your energy can have. More often than not, if I really up my energy and run about somewhere in the field the gang will stop eating and come and join me. (Yes, I'm lucky, my fields aren't overlooked).
I'm getting a bit old for hurtling around fields with horses; you can get away with loopy antics like that when you're 20yo but probably not 50!
Totally off topic but I love those feet/hooves."Thud!"
![]()