Antibiotic only licensed for humans

G

GaynorU

New User
Joined
28 March 2022
Messages
9
Visit site
My otherwise healthy 11 year old dog had surgery 12 days ago to remove a recurring lump on her paw. The wound is now infected. Vet took a sample and the only antibiotic that can reliably tackle it is one that is not licensed for animals. As it could cause kidney problems the dog would have to be put on a drip, after administration.
Has anyone had experience of this treatment as I can find no information on the internet.
PS we are cleaning twice daily with saline and applying Flamazine. But not encouraging results so far….
 
Is your vet recommending using the antibiotic not licensed for animals? A second opinion might be worth considering and if they agree you could talk with them about all the possible side effects
 
Thank you for your replies. We are already trying what he called an ‘intermittent’ antibiotic which is used when others fail. We have an appointment tomorrow when we will know the way forward. I was just hoping that another dog owner had had a similar experience with unlicensed antibiotics. Thanks again
 
SAujla said:
Is your vet recommending using the antibiotic not licensed for animals? A second opinion might be worth considering and if they agree you could talk with them about all the possible side effects
Click to expand...


Whilst I don't wish to be rude, this post shows the difference been an inexperienced animal owner and one who has kept multiple animals for decades. Our vets have used drugs licensed for other species only, on all sorts of animals that we have had. We once lost a foal because an experienced vet, who we had known for years, had been treating him with an unlicensed- for- horses drug and then went on holiday, the replacement numpty inexperienced vet, who seemed to think that he was an equine expert wouldn't give he unlicensed drug to the foal and he had to be pts, despite having been making progress under the original treatment. If that's the only drug that will work, what choice do you have? A 2nd opinion isn't going to be able to magic up another drug.
 
Which antibiotic is the vet planning on using? Has it been used much in dogs?

The vet is unlikely to have suggested it without good reason, but it is still better for the owner to be fully informed on the pros/cons. Using drugs licensed in one species for another where it isn't licensed is not that uncommon.

Good luck.
 
Pearlsasinger said:
Whilst I don't wish to be rude, this post shows the difference been an inexperienced animal owner and one who has kept multiple animals for decades. Our vets have used drugs licensed for other species only, on all sorts of animals that we have had. We once lost a foal because an experienced vet, who we had known for years, had been treating him with an unlicensed- for- horses drug and then went on holiday, the replacement numpty inexperienced vet, who seemed to think that he was an equine expert wouldn't give he unlicensed drug to the foal and he had to be pts, despite having been making progress under the original treatment. If that's the only drug that will work, what choice do you have? A 2nd opinion isn't going to be able to magic up another drug.
Click to expand...
If you don't wish to be rude then don't be. I never said a second opinion would magic up another drug, but could confirm the first vet was right to suggest it.
 
Thanks everyone for your replies. I will ask the vet tomorrow for a clearer picture. As as I said I was hoping that a fellow dog owner had been through similar but, I’m learning from all the comments!
 
Pen had a non dog ab when she had surgery on a bad leg wound in January. I signed the authorisation straight away.
Mine did talk me through the risks, as yours did. I didn’t have a lot of time to consider options, under the circumstances, but if you trust your vet and they can tell you your dog is not the first it’s ever been used on, I’d not worry.
 
Last edited:
Clodagh said:
Pen had a non dog ab when she had surgery on a bad leg wound in January. I signed the authorisation straight away.
Mine did talk me through the risks, as yours did. I didn’t have a lot of time to consider options, under the circumstances, but if you trust your vet and they can tell you your dog is not the first it’s ever been used on, I’d not worry.
Click to expand...
Thank you, the vet says that this has only happened to him twice in 10 years! I have to trust his guidance and I’m heartened that another dog owner has been through this.
 
GaynorU said:
Thank you, the vet says that this has only happened to him twice in 10 years! I have to trust his guidance and I’m heartened that another dog owner has been through this.
Click to expand...
She bounced back from the surgery very well, with no long term ill effects. Everything has a risk of course, but not treating it isn’t an option either. (As you know).
 
SAujla said:
If you don't wish to be rude then don't be. I never said a second opinion would magic up another drug, but could confirm the first vet was right to suggest it.
Click to expand...


So what would the other vet be able to suggest, given that the lab has tested the bacteria and said that only one antibiotic will counteract the infection? Or would you expect this vet to say 'pts, there is nothing we can do?'
 
Pearlsasinger said:
So what would the other vet be able to suggest, given that the lab has tested the bacteria and said that only one antibiotic will counteract the infection? Or would you expect this vet to say 'pts, there is nothing we can do?'
Click to expand...
Give reassurance and pass on their experience as they could know more. You can make your point without trying to put me down for my lack of experience
 
SAujla said:
Give reassurance and pass on their experience as they could know more. You can make your point without trying to put me down for my lack of experience
Click to expand...



I was not trying to put you down. I have enjoyed your posts about your first dog - she is lovely and you are obviously a caring owner who did plenty of research before choosing her but OP may not know that you are a first time dog owner and your post didn't make that clear.
No-one would expect the owner of a healthy 3(?) yr old first time dog to have wide experience of vets and their advice, or how they use 'unlicensed' drugs where appropriate, nor the circumstances which could lead to an 'unlicensed' drug being recommended
 
Pearlsasinger said:
I was not trying to put you down. I have enjoyed your posts about your first dog - she is lovely and you are obviously a caring owner who did plenty of research before choosing her but OP may not know that you are a first time dog owner and your post didn't make that clear.
No-one would expect the owner of a healthy 3(?) yr old first time dog to have wide experience of vets and their advice, or how they use 'unlicensed' drugs where appropriate.
Click to expand...
She's just turned 2 in February and fair enough, I never looked at it from that angle my apologies.
 
Using unlicensed drugs isn’t uncommon in animals. In fact there’s lots of legislation on it, it’s called “the cascade”. Very briefly put the cascade is the means of weighing up the pros and cons of using the unlicensed drug to prevent an animal suffering and, when possible, exhausting options of licensed drugs first.

If that’s what’s your vet is recommending and supportive treatment is required I would take the option they give. Infection is no longer a scary word but it will be in the future, animals and people do unfortunately get very sick and die from untreated infections.
 
To be fair, another vet may have another way of looking at it - e.g. suggesting a different way of treating the infection - Antibiotics are not the be all and end all and there is a degree of interpretation - e.g. in some people you could swab and find they are resistant to all antibiotics but treating it with something else e.g. manuka honey might be more appropriate anyway as the bacteria is not significant. A second opinion is definitely not a bad idea, with an experienced surgical vet.
 
SusieT said:
To be fair, another vet may have another way of looking at it - e.g. suggesting a different way of treating the infection - Antibiotics are not the be all and end all and there is a degree of interpretation - e.g. in some people you could swab and find they are resistant to all antibiotics but treating it with something else e.g. manuka honey might be more appropriate anyway as the bacteria is not significant. A second opinion is definitely not a bad idea, with an experienced surgical vet.[/QUOTE
SusieT said:
To be fair, another vet may have another way of looking at it - e.g. suggesting a different way of treating the infection - Antibiotics are not the be all and end all and there is a degree of interpretation - e.g. in some people you could swab and find they are resistant to all antibiotics but treating it with something else e.g. manuka honey might be more appropriate anyway as the bacteria is not significant. A second opinion is definitely not a bad idea, with an experienced surgical vet.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Definitely don't hang about with this. I had a cat that had an infection in its paw caused by a feral tom. Vet could not get on top of the infection so leg was removed but the infection still spread and we lost her. That was a bit of an extreme case though as the infection had got into the lymph system and was basically untreatable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top