Any idea why this Science Plan is so cheap?

Demolition_Derby

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 February 2008
Messages
687
Visit site
It just seems too cheap to be true?
confused.gif


http://www.chemistdirect.co.uk/hills-canine-science-plan_v_2491.html

Thoughts? Do you think its a bit dodgy?
 
Thank you - I hadn't had a chance to look at that (Im illegally on the internet at work
shocked.gif
) but you're right it does. Well, in that case I *think* I have finally made my mind up! Thank you
smile.gif


**also ducks with Widget to avoid the avalanche of vets**
tongue.gif
grin.gif
 
I trained as a vet nurse and i never feed my animals on what the vets sell, my cat is fed on chudleys cat food, she has a nice glossy coat and healthy teath, so thats good enough for me!!!!
 
[ QUOTE ]
I trained as a vet nurse and i never feed my animals on what the vets sell, my cat is fed on chudleys cat food, she has a nice glossy coat and healthy teath, so thats good enough for me!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

They recommended Burns to me and two of my dogs pulled their hair out on that!!
 
[ QUOTE ]
I actually like the ingredients
shocked.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

really? Even the chicken by product meal, beet pulp and animal fat?
tongue.gif


I would rather mine ate chicken muscle meat - with fat from either olive oil or maybe a fattier muscle meat... and I thought beet pulp was just filler...

Each their own tho
grin.gif
tongue.gif


Anyway - i thought you fed raw?!
tongue.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
As far as I remember, dogs have a much higher fat requirement than humans do, and animal fat is a normal part of meat!

[/ QUOTE ]

Not only that - they use fat in a different way to us - more like the way we use carbs (sugars, not complex) for instant energy. But I was not saying they shouldn't have fat - it's the source of the fat that i was questioning...
 
"it's the source of the fat that i was questioning... "

Can dogs utilise vegeatable oils in the same way that they do fats?

Actually, I don't think it tells us much - probably completely wrong about this but the animal fat listed might just mean it did come from a fatty cut of meat originally, not that it was all added as poured-on-fat. As with the minerals etc. - that would be in the total food, rather than all added as chemicals as a separate ingredient. An analysis of the food won't say what form something was added in/as only that it is present as an ingredient?

Same when people worry about food being high water content - meat and vegetables are, unless you artificially dry them, so it doesn't (necessarily) mean that gallons of water have been added
smile.gif
 
Top