MotherOfChickens
MotherDucker
The question I also wanted to ask but didn't want to appear to show prejudice towards some breeds or types.
ah, always happy to appear prejudiced
The question I also wanted to ask but didn't want to appear to show prejudice towards some breeds or types.
As a generalisation, I do think it is irresponsible for anyone to say 'you can have whatever breed or line of dog you want, based on looks, as long as you socialise or train it'.
That's just not true in many cases. Look at that video of the sheepdog puppy posted last week....that's born, not made. I've never seen a police pug. A St Bernard won't win at flyball.
That's not what they're for.
Lots of dogs are lovely in their home environments. It's when they reach a certain age and/or are subjected to stress or stimuli when you see what's in them.
As a generalisation, I do think it is irresponsible for anyone to say 'you can have whatever breed or line of dog you want, based on looks, as long as you socialise or train it'.
That's just not true in many cases. Look at that video of the sheepdog puppy posted last week....that's born, not made. I've never seen a police pug. A St Bernard won't win at flyball.
That's not what they're for.
Lots of dogs are lovely in their home environments. It's when they reach a certain age and/or are subjected to stress or stimuli when you see what's in them.
Absolutely agree! I for one would welcome testing and licensing for this exact reason.As a generalisation, I do think it is irresponsible for anyone to say 'you can have whatever breed or line of dog you want, based on looks, as long as you socialise or train it'.
That's just not true in many cases. Look at that video of the sheepdog puppy posted last week....that's born, not made. I've never seen a police pug. A St Bernard won't win at flyball.
That's not what they're for.
Lots of dogs are lovely in their home environments. It's when they reach a certain age and/or are subjected to stress or stimuli when you see what's in them.
Statistically, you're still more likely to get bitten by a Labrador.
Absolutely agree! I for one would welcome testing and licensing for this exact reason.
Mastiffs are my dog of choice (I wouldn't have anything else again) because yes i do like the look of them obviously but i feel safe with one around (although my current DDB X english mastiff is as daft as a brush) and TBH I really don't like small dogs, they get under your feet and yap, I just feel more comfortable around big dogs, they are my comfort zone and I know how to handle them, maybe because I was brought up with horses so a mastiff is a little like having a horse thats allowed in the houseI have to say although I appreciate that they can look menacing, I don't half get annoyed when ignorant people assume that they are aggressive and pass stupid comments or cross over the road to avoid walking past. I take great pride when people stop to ask me about the breed though, it's always nice to educate people who take an interest
well yes-but only because there are more labradors. what about matched numbers of each?
As an ex VN, I can tell you I was way more likely to be bitten by a Westie than anything else but that I would rather be bitten by a westie than anything bigger-the margin for error in massive breeds is just so much smaller due to the damage they could do.
Only met a couple in veterinary practice. Both were so dangerously aggressive that they basically lived a life with Baskerville muzzles on and could only be examined once sedated.