Bare foot dilema

cptrayes

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 March 2008
Messages
14,749
Visit site
People please, please stop talking about your individual horse, individual farriers and individual trimmers. Single cases are irrelevent. This is not about single animals or people, it's about "most" horses.

The Farrier - You think things through carefully and I'd be really interested to hear your view on the fact that horses are supposed to bear weight on their frog and that it is almost impossible to achieve this with any kind of shoe on the foot.

TPO the evidence you are looking for is horses which were condemned to die back in full work. Dozens of them. A group of them are happily hunting for up to seven hours on Exmoor, in the hands of a professional rehabilitation yard. One of those, just one of many, a 23 year old who was six years in heart bars and unsound. And yes there are MRI scans showing the cures.

The proof is in the Insurance Companies who are paying that yard to rehabilitate navicular horses so they do not have to pay loss of use claims. If you really want to know how that happens, as opposed to having a jolly good fun argument on this forum, do the research that's out there. Check my previous posts and you'll see the website addresses to start at.

People are so happy to have "expert opinions". How many children have been sent home from hospital with every symptom of meningitis, only to die, because people trusted the men in the white coats when they were told it was "just a bit of a virus, give them some junior paracetamol"? How many horses are being shot because expert vets and farriers are not telling owners that Insurers are paying for successful professional rehab for naviular horses?

One day, I predict, navicular syndrome will be recognised as
a) caused by shoes
b) curable in most cases.

I predict that knowing what harm shoes cause, we will return to the old days when horses had three months a year out of shoes, depending on whether they were spring/summer/autumn workers (SJ/showing/eventing) or autumn/winter/spring workers (hunters).

I predict that thousands of people will finally realise that their horses can do brilliantly well, roadwork, stones and the rest, without shoes at all.

I also predict that there will be dozens of heartbroken owners preparing to sue their vets and farriers, for not telling them about evidence that their horse might be able to be cured which was available in 2008, and instead recommending them to shoot their horses.

My hopes lie with the profit-orientated insurance companies, who surely will soon start to realise that they can refuse loss of use and death claims if a horse can be rehabilitated?

Meanwhile I continue to occasionally use forums to vent my frustration that my own vet (Head of a large Practice) shows a spectacular lack of interest in seeing the scans I have told him about. And that is in spite of the fact that he has had to vet two of my own horses for sale with A1 5 star vettings and seen my own horses hunt and event and the marvellous feet they have.

One day......

I won't post again, I have said what I want to say. If anyone wants to PM me with genuine enquiry and desire to learn more, please do. And you sceptics? I can assure you that there is NOTHING that you are saying here or anywhere else that I did not say myself before I took to barefoot in a desperate bid to save my own horse from becoming a cripple.

Bye folks.
 

TheFarrier

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 February 2009
Messages
1,027
jamesthefarrier.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
The Farrier - You think things through carefully and I'd be really interested to hear your view on the fact that horses are supposed to bear weight on their frog and that it is almost impossible to achieve this with any kind of shoe on the foot.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is possible to shoe any horse with frog contact, with some it takes longer to establish but a high percentage of horses that i shoe, i shoe with frog to ground contact. I believe that it is healthier for the horse. Shoes do a lot of good, sometimes they are a necessary evil but they also do good, and not all horses need shoes and not all owners have the time or inclination to wait out the barefoot transition.

There are products on the market that are better than steel as they allow the hoof more flexion and eliminate concussion. however they are not as cost effective as steel. hopefully this will be remidied in the not too near future.
 

amandap

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 June 2009
Messages
6,949
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
No it wasn't a bare foot trimmer who commented on the spooky ones trim.I am loosing a little trust in my bare foot trimmer though. I have noticed that its the surface they are standing on that affects them most. In my last yard the grazing was very wet. Several horses had poor feet.Once they started coming in at night the feet improved.It was me that realized what propbably had affected the newbies feet along with his general make up.I do believet here are fabulous farriers/bare foot trimmers and some very poor ones of both.

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps having a look at what you're feeding may help? High sugar and mineral imbalances are from what I understand the main causes of 'footiness'. Imo feet are part of the horse not an add on so you do really need to use an holistic approach.
Also if thrush is present the horse will be 'footy'. If he's spooky too a magnesium deficiency, which is common I believe in England, may well be part of the problem, so giving magnesium oxide if worth a try too.
 

hoofsculpture

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 January 2007
Messages
115
Visit site
hi t p o, no type of trim can put hoof horn on, it can only remove, so in you,r horses case no trimming of the heels is pos
sible. so heels must be formed in another way ie urithane. heels will never grow back properly in shoes, this is because what heels she has will slide in and out on the shoe, so any heel growth there is will flare out over the shoe. i would want to know who removed her heels, if she had heels who removed them, if she had no heels you should have been told that not even a sound horse can be expected to walk if the heels are taken down in one trim.
 

mrdarcy

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 June 2006
Messages
1,913
Location
La la land
www.rockcrunchers.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]

It is possible to shoe any horse with frog contact, with some it takes longer to establish but a high percentage of horses that i shoe, i shoe with frog to ground contact. I believe that it is healthier for the horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can I ask why you think this is healthier? What do you consider the benefit for the shod horse in having frog/ground contact?

The frog in the barefoot horse acts as a hinge. It has only passive contact with the ground but allows the foot to expand as it becomes load bearing and this expansion of the hoof causes the blood to circulate throughout the foot, which is essential for the health of all the internal structures, e.g ensuring a sufficient supply of blood to the navicular bone, lack of which is believed to be one of the causes of navicular bone degeneration. Metal shoes prevent the hoof from spreading apart as it bears weight, the frog cannot fulfill it's function as a hinge and therefore blood circulation in the hoof is severly compromised at each stride. So in the shod horse the main function of the frog can never be achieved.

The only possible benefit of a shod horse having frog/ground contact would be extra grip but I've yet to ride a shod horse that has decent grip on a slippy tarmac surface, however close to ground his frogs might be.
 
Top