Nickles1973
Well-Known Member
I have posted this elsewhere but I am hoping for more replies from the HHO faithful!
I started towards taking my ex-racer's shoes off in early July due to a front end lameness which had been diagnosed as an imbalance in his n/s front pedal bone. I had started investigations with the vet for a hind end problem but thought that going barefoot would most likely help rather than hinder.
I changed his diet and then about 3 weeks later my farrier took the unconventional step of taking his front shoes off and replacing them with Vettec plastic shoes which allowed his hooves to transition more gradually to going bare. His back shoes had to stay on through his lameness investigstions as I couldn't risk the vet assuming he was lame due to the lack of shoes.
Fast forward 6 weeks and his front hooves had grown dramatically and the back of his hooves have begun to change. His soles no longer give under thumb pressure and he is comfortable standing on the concrete outside his stable. (previously unheard of) Last Thursday my farrier took his vettec shoes off and also removed his hind shoes.
He looked quite happy on Thursday but seemed a little sore on Friday which I suppose is to be expected. Our yard is extremely stoney (think 3inch pebbles spread over the ground to aid drainage) and the field is like lumpy concrete so I think he's doing well considering.
Everyday since though he has looked a little better.
However, today my worst suspicions were confirmed and the vet has diagnosed bilateral suspensory damage after already diagnosing early signs of hock spavin and fetlock arthritis.
Straight away the vet is talking about having him shod in rolled toe'd lateral extension shoes and I am left not really knowing what to do for the best.
I made the decision to take him bare to try to ensure his long term soundness but I'm left feeling like if I don't put the "special" shoes on I am in fact doing the opposite.
Does anyone have any advice they can offer me which would help me argue my case to my vet? He is talking to Sue Dyson tomorrow and will report back to me with what he considers to be our plan but I'd like to challenge his shoeing suggestion with a reasoned arguement.
Sorry for the essay, I didn't realise it would be so long. Thanks in advance
I started towards taking my ex-racer's shoes off in early July due to a front end lameness which had been diagnosed as an imbalance in his n/s front pedal bone. I had started investigations with the vet for a hind end problem but thought that going barefoot would most likely help rather than hinder.
I changed his diet and then about 3 weeks later my farrier took the unconventional step of taking his front shoes off and replacing them with Vettec plastic shoes which allowed his hooves to transition more gradually to going bare. His back shoes had to stay on through his lameness investigstions as I couldn't risk the vet assuming he was lame due to the lack of shoes.
Fast forward 6 weeks and his front hooves had grown dramatically and the back of his hooves have begun to change. His soles no longer give under thumb pressure and he is comfortable standing on the concrete outside his stable. (previously unheard of) Last Thursday my farrier took his vettec shoes off and also removed his hind shoes.
He looked quite happy on Thursday but seemed a little sore on Friday which I suppose is to be expected. Our yard is extremely stoney (think 3inch pebbles spread over the ground to aid drainage) and the field is like lumpy concrete so I think he's doing well considering.
Everyday since though he has looked a little better.
However, today my worst suspicions were confirmed and the vet has diagnosed bilateral suspensory damage after already diagnosing early signs of hock spavin and fetlock arthritis.
Straight away the vet is talking about having him shod in rolled toe'd lateral extension shoes and I am left not really knowing what to do for the best.
I made the decision to take him bare to try to ensure his long term soundness but I'm left feeling like if I don't put the "special" shoes on I am in fact doing the opposite.
Does anyone have any advice they can offer me which would help me argue my case to my vet? He is talking to Sue Dyson tomorrow and will report back to me with what he considers to be our plan but I'd like to challenge his shoeing suggestion with a reasoned arguement.
Sorry for the essay, I didn't realise it would be so long. Thanks in advance