fburton
Well-Known Member
Clear enough to me, Amandap!I am not a believer that horses are automatically damaged by being told, as opposed to asked, in fair and appropriate circumstances though.
Mmm, don't think my point is very clear is it?
Yes, there is a middle ground - of course you are right there. If a dangerous situation arises, you have to deal with it there and then to keep everyone safe. All I'm saying is that prevention is better than cure, and a little deliberate and systematic preparation goes a long way to avoiding the kind of situation where a more extreme response would be called for.
I also see nothing wrong with correction/punishment as long as it fair and consistent. In my opinion, it should never look like bullying - and I was frankly shocked that anyone would advocate that here. What I find irksome and unhelpful is the assumption that the severity of a person's response to bad behaviour should be in proportion to how the person perceives it, rather than adjusting it to produce the most effective result for the horse - stopping the behaviour without creating unnecessary fear, bad feeling or loss of trust. This assumption means that, if the horse hurts you, he deserves to be hit in return. But why does the punishment need to fit the crime? We're not dealing with moral beings here! One only needs to do what's needed to stop the behaviour.