elijahasgal
Well-Known Member
But not all that have decent pedigress & considered high powered are unsuitable for lower level riders. Just like not all TB's are unsuitable for novices because they are all hot-heads. Or all cobs are suitable for novices.
These discussions have been going on for as long as I can remember & beyond. Nothing is perfect but gradings, the BEF Futurities etc are better then nothing.
I think that you will find the MAJORITY of people who are against what is going on in the Futurity.etc, would rather a standardised system
KWPN x-rays have to be clear when the stallion grades, Hanoverians they can have OCD prevalant.
Maybe it is time that we have our own standards. That even if these foreign horses stand in this country, they have to conform to OUR rules and our standards. Nothing is going to stop the import of semen though. And no I am not on about GRADING, I am on about the health, x-rays, DNA for anything hereditary.
What we also need is a catagory for young horses that have injured themselves, as there are a few about, with all the qualaties that we want to be breeding from.
But then to exclude them from the Futurity for being from as yet unlisenced stallions? You miss a fantastic chance to assess new stallions, that may be passing on exactly the qualaties that we need, and identifying them quicker, AND helping owners improve their knowledge.
Without being funny, a huge amount of the warmblood market is bloodline to bloodline, without a clue as to what confirmation faults need improving. I would be willing to bet though that the studs that are producing the best stock have the old values, assessing confirmation, assessing weaknesses and strengths, and the ability to improve mares with the correct stallion.