Lizzie66
Well-Known Member
The negligence in the view of the judge was taking a horse hunting who you expected may kick. The argument was successfully put forward that anybody with a horse that may kick has the responsibility to make sure it is not in a position were it could do damage to others. This view may seem reasonable to anybody outside horses.
The circumstances in your friends case may well be different.
In this instance the 3rd party ran into the other person either deliberately or because they lacked control. The space was apparently more than sufficient for the 3rd party to have avoided the other horse altogether so therefore the responsibility is with the person who got kicked to have control of their horse.
To me red ribbons should be in horses that may kick out unprovoked at things passing, not in horses that may kick if someone rams into them. At the end of the day any horse may kick out if they feel sufficiently threatened and a strange horse ramming it from behind is pretty threatening.