BBP
Well-Known Member
Ok, so I keep getting into big arguments about this, but i'm not sure i'm on the right side of the fence! In the best interests of my horse I have been looking into the pros and cons of bitless riding. I am going to keep riding him in a bit as I think it is important for him to understand one in his formative years in training (if nothing else, if I drop dead and someone else goes to ride him, I don't want him to be terrified by a bit) but that doesn't mean I think bitless has no merit.
However, everyone around me is insistent that bitless bridles are a crude piece of engineering that allows for no finesse of signals, and that you cannot achieve any degree of engagement with one as you can with a bit...oh, and that I am a hippy for considering it. This annoyed me as the implication was that the bit is integral to any sort of communication with a horse whilst I would, in an ideal world, like to think that I am working the horse through his body, not his face. I've found myself getting a bit stroppy and defensive about the idea but I don't know if they are right and I am just arguing because it irks me that they put me down all the time.
So, those who have used them, can you achieve the same degree of communication as you can with a bit?
However, everyone around me is insistent that bitless bridles are a crude piece of engineering that allows for no finesse of signals, and that you cannot achieve any degree of engagement with one as you can with a bit...oh, and that I am a hippy for considering it. This annoyed me as the implication was that the bit is integral to any sort of communication with a horse whilst I would, in an ideal world, like to think that I am working the horse through his body, not his face. I've found myself getting a bit stroppy and defensive about the idea but I don't know if they are right and I am just arguing because it irks me that they put me down all the time.
So, those who have used them, can you achieve the same degree of communication as you can with a bit?