Blimey, would this pic make you want to buy?

[CeeBee]

Was browsing Robinsons for jods and came across this pair.

http://www.robinsons-uk.com/product...pCode=0101&groupCode=01102&view=all#sku.22494

Not the most flattering pic is it?

I appreciate Robinsons are trying to use real people for models and that actually the model probably looks better in jods than me, but have to say doesn't inspire me to want to buy them!

 

[maletto]

just takes me to the overall page for jods.

what's the description/price & I'll have a look!

 

[CeeBee]

Darn, link didn't work. They are the Newcomers Jods for £16 .....

 

[dumpling]

Not sure if I've got the right pair, but I can't see anything wrong?

 

[maletto]

hahah!! they're supposed to be for kids but look like they're being modelled by an oompa loompa!!

no, I wouldn't buy them based on the pic!!

 

[orionstar]

Looks like some Victorian contraption to save your chastity!

 

[MrsMozart]

Young child modelling them.

 

[Umbongo]

Isn't it a little kid?

 

[CeeBee]

hahah!! they're supposed to be for kids but look like they're being modelled by an oompa loompa!!

no, I wouldn't buy them based on the pic!!

Oops, there goes my horlicks all over my keyboard - yes oompa loompa, that's exactly what they look like

 

[dumpling]

Looks like some Victorian contraption to save your chastity!

haha! those were the ones I saw, the starter ones are for children.

 

[CeeBee]

Oh, I see we are looking a different ones. Actually I quite like the look of the chastity type ones, ideal for 'fat' days or 'not so fat' days.
Feel bad that I laughed at the newcomers ones now if it is a child modelling them - obviously didn't read the description properly. However still not sure I would have found the photo appealing to buy for any of my 3 when they were younger...

 

[miss_bird]

The side/back view is not too bad but the photographer who took the front on view needs the sack, makes the jods and the childs legs look dreadful, Just like as said above an oomph loomph