Body condition scoring research

[Isabelleb200]

Hi I hope this is okay to post on here,
I am currently in my final year at Harper Adams University, conducting research for my dissertation project which is investigating the accuracy of equine body condition scoring among individuals involved with horses in the UK, and exploring whether factors such as age, experience, qualifications, competition involvement, and level of responsibility for horse care influence accuracy. If anyone has 5 minutes to answer some background questions and fill in a body condition scoring task, it would be greatly appreciated!

Questionnaire link:

https://app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk/s/harper-adams/dissertation-questionnaire-3

 

[moosea]

Done.

Would be interesting to follow this up with some results.

 

[Midlifecrisis]

Done…I too would be interested in the results you find.

 

[Gropony]

This is interesting. I would maybe have had a question on if the person had direct experience with laminitis, Cushing's or EMS and similar, as I imagine these are the people who are more concentrated on this type of observation. Good luck with it all!

 

[planete]

Done.

 

[SEL]

That was interesting!

 

[JenJ]

Done, and as above, interested in the results!

 

[Gloi]

Done. I competed affiliated 30+ years ago so I put that but have not competed for a long time.

 

[Fransurrey]

Done. Do update us with results!

 

[Lynnfigaro]

Done.

 

[New Forests Rock]

Done, please update us with results. Very interesting!

 

[greasedweasel]

Would also be interested in the results. One thing and it may just be me was I found the use of “poor” odd. To me a zero is emaciated yet if someone was to say their horse was “poor” I’d think of something that was a bit ribby (probably a 2?)

 

[JenJ]

Would also be interested in the results. One thing and it may just be me was I found the use of “poor” odd. To me a zero is emaciated yet if someone was to say their horse was “poor” I’d think of something that was a bit ribby (probably a 2?)

I did think the descriptions weren't quite aligned with, for example, the BHS descriptions - emaciated, thin, lean, good, fat, obese vs the survey of poor, very thin, thin, moderate, fat, obese.

 

[Surbie]

Would also be interested in the results. One thing and it may just be me was I found the use of “poor” odd. To me a zero is emaciated yet if someone was to say their horse was “poor” I’d think of something that was a bit ribby (probably a 2?)

Yes I agree.

Interesting though - particularly as my horse was on the weighbridge today too.