Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
The courts have interpreted flushing out to mean just getting the animal out of cover, not the subsequent chase. Even that alone will be illegal if the animal isn't shot.
What I've been doing which is to walk my dogs through a wood, thereby knowingly and flushing out animals which I then prevent the dogs from chasing but also refuse to shoot is a crime.
But hang on, how can I walk my dogs through my wood without flushing out a deer?
The stag hounds will now almost certainly face prosecution ifhey've been interpreting flushing out as flushing ie including the chase.
Hunting is probably now completely stuffed. The only way to save it is mass civil disobedience. But this disobedience should be done by flushing, not chasing and refusing to shoot. Anyone with a doig can go out and do this, they don't even have to find an animal to be guilty. The police won't do any thing because they know the law is absurd.
What I've been doing which is to walk my dogs through a wood, thereby knowingly and flushing out animals which I then prevent the dogs from chasing but also refuse to shoot is a crime.
But hang on, how can I walk my dogs through my wood without flushing out a deer?
The stag hounds will now almost certainly face prosecution ifhey've been interpreting flushing out as flushing ie including the chase.
Hunting is probably now completely stuffed. The only way to save it is mass civil disobedience. But this disobedience should be done by flushing, not chasing and refusing to shoot. Anyone with a doig can go out and do this, they don't even have to find an animal to be guilty. The police won't do any thing because they know the law is absurd.