alleycat
Well-Known Member
I've been struck, on reading peoples' breeding choices, and also the interesting stuff in the Competition Rider's section, where people actually get on & do things with the horses we breed, how wide a range of breeds and types are consisered appropriate for breeding eventers.
If you want to breed a dressage horse, a showjumper, an endurance horse or a racehorse, your path is pretty well mapped out for you; you're evaluating individuals within one or two appropriate breeds ot types, and there seems to be quite a lot of agreement on the qualities you need. Breeding an eventer, however: thats a different matter.
I remember reading somewhere that a good TB was an ideal eventer. However, although TB blood features strongly, its generally being mixed with something in the breeding I've seen. That "something" has been: native pony (particularly Connemara and Welsh D), Arab, Irish Draught, Cleveland Bay, Clydesdale, Warmblood- particularly Trakehener (can never spell that) and Selle Francais but also Hannoverian and Dutch, Quarterhorse (sure I saw that somewhere), Lusitano- and I don't suppose that list is exhaustive.
Quite a few of the part TB sires I've seen are 15/16ths TB; which would suggest that TB is almost ideal after all; but that that little bit of something else is important enough to warrant keeping. On the other hand, I can't help feeling we've lost our way a bit; that what we've got ISN'T ideal but we're not sure what is.
So, what do you look for in an eventer? Apart from the obvious things, I mean, such as it must be sound, brave and able to jump? What sort of action, jump, shoulder, head carriage, hindquarter, size, etc. What are people hoping to add when they breed to a pony? to a warmblood? a draught? an arab? What does the TB lack that requires crossbreeding to correct it or enhance it? What do these other breeds lack that they, too, are cross bred?
As I've mentioned before I rather like the look of Pembridge Minstrel, if I can track him down: (Cleveland Bay/TB cross); he looks big, scopey and correct and has shown he can perform and I think he would suit my mare (TB). However, I'm going almost on instinct here; a gut feeling that this is a good horse. In terms of analysing my choice I have very little to go on because in fact I don't know what I should be aiming for, to take the finished article out of the category of "good" into the realm of "excellent".
The odd thing is, I don't think I'm alone in this. Even successful studs deeply involved in breeding eventers seem to keep refering back in their breeding choices to "good" horses that, in my judgement, were catapulted to "excellent" status almost by chance, because they had excellent riders when eventing was developing as a sport. I have a sneaking feeling this may be true of the Ben Faerie family for example; yes, they are good, but are they THAT good? On the other hand, the Just A Monarch horses seem to have been truly great, achieving success in different areas under different riders. But why? What made them special?
So next year, if I set out to breed an eventer, what exactly should I be aiming for, and what sires, in such a wide choice, might provide it?
If you want to breed a dressage horse, a showjumper, an endurance horse or a racehorse, your path is pretty well mapped out for you; you're evaluating individuals within one or two appropriate breeds ot types, and there seems to be quite a lot of agreement on the qualities you need. Breeding an eventer, however: thats a different matter.
I remember reading somewhere that a good TB was an ideal eventer. However, although TB blood features strongly, its generally being mixed with something in the breeding I've seen. That "something" has been: native pony (particularly Connemara and Welsh D), Arab, Irish Draught, Cleveland Bay, Clydesdale, Warmblood- particularly Trakehener (can never spell that) and Selle Francais but also Hannoverian and Dutch, Quarterhorse (sure I saw that somewhere), Lusitano- and I don't suppose that list is exhaustive.
Quite a few of the part TB sires I've seen are 15/16ths TB; which would suggest that TB is almost ideal after all; but that that little bit of something else is important enough to warrant keeping. On the other hand, I can't help feeling we've lost our way a bit; that what we've got ISN'T ideal but we're not sure what is.
So, what do you look for in an eventer? Apart from the obvious things, I mean, such as it must be sound, brave and able to jump? What sort of action, jump, shoulder, head carriage, hindquarter, size, etc. What are people hoping to add when they breed to a pony? to a warmblood? a draught? an arab? What does the TB lack that requires crossbreeding to correct it or enhance it? What do these other breeds lack that they, too, are cross bred?
As I've mentioned before I rather like the look of Pembridge Minstrel, if I can track him down: (Cleveland Bay/TB cross); he looks big, scopey and correct and has shown he can perform and I think he would suit my mare (TB). However, I'm going almost on instinct here; a gut feeling that this is a good horse. In terms of analysing my choice I have very little to go on because in fact I don't know what I should be aiming for, to take the finished article out of the category of "good" into the realm of "excellent".
The odd thing is, I don't think I'm alone in this. Even successful studs deeply involved in breeding eventers seem to keep refering back in their breeding choices to "good" horses that, in my judgement, were catapulted to "excellent" status almost by chance, because they had excellent riders when eventing was developing as a sport. I have a sneaking feeling this may be true of the Ben Faerie family for example; yes, they are good, but are they THAT good? On the other hand, the Just A Monarch horses seem to have been truly great, achieving success in different areas under different riders. But why? What made them special?
So next year, if I set out to breed an eventer, what exactly should I be aiming for, and what sires, in such a wide choice, might provide it?