PolarSkye
Well-Known Member
I was thinking about this when I was poo picking today . . . and wondered which point of view you all would hold . . . setting the scene . . .
Horse (we'll call him Horse C) has quite recently (within the past two months) moved to a new yard and is sharing a field with two horses who were part of an established herd . . . we'll call them Horse A and Horse B. Horse A is clearly the herd boss, Horse B is his second in command . . . and Horse C is quite happy to be at the bottom. Both A and B continually move C off any hay, best grass, water trough . . . there are no feet involved, just face-pulling, charging and teeth bared with the occasional nip thrown in. They will all stand together and eat from their individual hay piles, but C isn't allowed to settle for long - either A or B (usually A) will periodically drive him off (about every 2-3 minutes). A and B will play, A and C will play, but B and C never play . . . and A determines who plays with him, how and when. If A is feeling particularly playful he won't let either B OR C eat in peace . . . nor will he let them roll without nipping at them, making them get up. A also determines whether and when B and/or C play with or interact with the horses over the fence. Lastly, A is a serial rug-ripper . . . when he plays, he plays hard and B and C often come in with bite marks. No kicks though.
POV 1: Boys will be boys . . . this is herd politics and it's normal and natural.
POV 2: Horse A is a royal pain in the rear, is dominant, but not a bully
POV 3: Horse A is a bit of a bully
I know what I think . . . but I'm curious what you think . . .
P
Horse (we'll call him Horse C) has quite recently (within the past two months) moved to a new yard and is sharing a field with two horses who were part of an established herd . . . we'll call them Horse A and Horse B. Horse A is clearly the herd boss, Horse B is his second in command . . . and Horse C is quite happy to be at the bottom. Both A and B continually move C off any hay, best grass, water trough . . . there are no feet involved, just face-pulling, charging and teeth bared with the occasional nip thrown in. They will all stand together and eat from their individual hay piles, but C isn't allowed to settle for long - either A or B (usually A) will periodically drive him off (about every 2-3 minutes). A and B will play, A and C will play, but B and C never play . . . and A determines who plays with him, how and when. If A is feeling particularly playful he won't let either B OR C eat in peace . . . nor will he let them roll without nipping at them, making them get up. A also determines whether and when B and/or C play with or interact with the horses over the fence. Lastly, A is a serial rug-ripper . . . when he plays, he plays hard and B and C often come in with bite marks. No kicks though.
POV 1: Boys will be boys . . . this is herd politics and it's normal and natural.
POV 2: Horse A is a royal pain in the rear, is dominant, but not a bully
POV 3: Horse A is a bit of a bully
I know what I think . . . but I'm curious what you think . . .
P