jo.stock
Member
Yes that’s what I have heard aswell I said I will ring every vet on speakerphone to clarify I did not have a vet to this ponyThey also have to prove that you know about the condition as far as I'm aware.
Yes that’s what I have heard aswell I said I will ring every vet on speakerphone to clarify I did not have a vet to this ponyThey also have to prove that you know about the condition as far as I'm aware.
I think I already did agree I recorded the hole thing I can send it you if you would like to listen to me absolutely messing it all up ?
Yes that’s what I have heard aswell I said I will ring every vet on speakerphone to clarify I did not have a vet to this pony
As had been made clear - thank god….was starting to wonder if the court process had disintegrated to a mad hatters tea party! ?It does not need an appeal, no court judgement has been made. This was an unbinding arbitration session.
.
It was done over the phone this woman Said she was a judge and what she would do if it was in her court and basically she said I sold a pony that I knew the woman wanted it for riding and it’s not fit for purpose and we need professional diagnosis so we have to pay half eachCan you explain what happened when you went to court ?
It was done over the phone this woman Said she was a judge and what she would do if it was in her court and basically she said I sold a pony that I knew the woman wanted it for riding and it’s not fit for purpose and we need professional diagnosis so we have to pay half each
Yes it was just a private saleThe judge is wrong unless you are a dealer. Is this the only pony you have sold?
It's also irrelevant that she a judge, in this case she is only acting as an arbitrator.
Her job as an arbitrator is to get people to agree so it never takes up court time, not to apply the law correctly. She has seen you as a pushover and done you down in order to achieve that end.
.
Yes it was a private saleJo.Stock
Is this the only pony you have sold in the last 2 years?
Hi I’m look for some advice on what to do. I sold a pony 6 months ago he was 4 years old and only lightly backed. I had owned him for 2 years never needed a vet never seen him lame.Anyway I sold him to a lady and her daughter she came to look at him with her experienced friend they rode him in the paddock and played with him and was happy and wanted him but didn’t have enough money until she had been paid at the end of the month. I was happy to wait because I thought they was the perfect people for him so I said they could have him on trail until they raised the money and that they could come down whenever they wanted I didn’t even need to know which they did I offered them to have the pony vetted but they didn’t feel the need the end of the month came and they was happy with him and bought him I gave them a receipt and wrote on sold as seen and the buyer signed it and took the pony I was getting updates every week saying he was settling in and he’s broken threw fences ect about a month later she txt me to say she was moving the pony to a different yard another month past and then I got a txt saying we have a problem max is lame and she has had a vet and she said he has laxity of the hock and it would of been apparent from birth I question it because I have never seen anything wrong with the pony so she’s taken it to court we had a resolution hearing yesterday and apparently I have to pay half the vet bill to have the pony x-rayed and a lameness test im so confused she didn’t want the pony vetting before purchasing so now why do I have to go halfs
It was done over the phone this woman Said she was a judge and what she would do if it was in her court and basically she said I sold a pony that I knew the woman wanted it for riding and it’s not fit for purpose and we need professional diagnosis so we have to pay half each
Yes I got court papers threw the post this hearing was a resolution hearing and non of it makes to me eitherHave you received any official emails or paperwork through the post to confirm a legal claim has been made against you?
Or did you just get a phonecall one day out of the blue from a person claiming to be a judge, after seller said they would take you to court?
I agree with snail…this case seems odd.
Yes I have all the messages advertising ect and I have said why didn’t anyone notice anything up with him in the month they was coming downThe pony breaking through fences as buyer admitted to, probably caused the lame injury.
The laxity would have been obvious to the experienced friend surely? Especially if they rode the pony, multiple times, on trial.
You probably already have done but a friendly reminder to keep all contact emails/texts/phone messages between you and buyer as evidence of how the deal happened. Keep all old photos of pony showing leg conformation before buyer bought pony.
Yes I got court papers threw the post this hearing was a resolution hearing and non of it makes to me either
Thank you for this so I do carry on with finding the vetsHi sorry to jump in. I don't usually post.
It sounds like a dispute resolution hearing which takes place before a judge and attempts to settle the case or narrow the issues before trial. It is likely that you have been ordered to pay half as this report will be used as joint evidence for the final hearing. The successful party may be awarded these costs back at the end of the case.
You should receive a court order shortly detailing the actions you need to take and when by. If you are in any doubt, phone the court to confirm. Please don't assume this was not judge led resolution. ?
Thank youWell, time to get yourself a good equine solicitor. PeterNat on here is usually able to supply a good list of them.
Thank you so muchFrom one of PeterNatts posts
Here is a list of Equine Solicitors:
I hope it helps!
Actons
Tel: 0115 91002200 Caroline Bowler
Mark Carter
White Bowker Solicitors
Tel: 01962 844440
www.wandb.co.uk
mark.carter@wandb.co.uk
Andrew Dalton
Who is a solicitor and rides a motorbike having been a courier www.adventurebikerider.com
Helen Niebuhr
Darbys Solicitors
52 New Inn Hall Street
Oxford
OX1 2QD
Tel: 01865 811 7000
01865 811712
Fax: 01865 811 777
www.equine-law.net
E: equine@darbys.co.uk
Jaqcui Fulton Equine Law
Tel: 0121 308 5915
jf@equinelawuk.co.uk
www.equinelawuk.co.uk
Hannah Campbell (Specialise in compensation cases)
Tel: 01446 794196 (Specialises in traffic accidents involving horses)
www.horsesolicitor.co.uk
info@horse solicitor
Hanna Campbell
Horse Solicitors
(Took on case in 2013 on behalf of Claire Berry-Jones) involving making a claim Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB)
Elizabeth Simpson Senior Solicitor at law firm Andrew M Jackson
Tel: 01482 325242
www.andrewjackson.co.uk
enquiries@andrewjackson.co.uk
David Forbes or Belinda Walkinshaw
Pickworths Solicitors
6 Victoria Street
St Albans
Hertfordshire
AL1 3JB
01727 844511
Mark de-villamar Roberts
Langleys Solicitors Equine Law Group
Tel: 01904 683051
E: mark.Roberts@langleys.com
www.equinelawyers.co.uk
Elizabeth Simpson
Senior Solicitor
Andrew Jackson
Yorkshire
Tel: 01482 325242
www.andrewjackson.co.uk
Richmond Solicitors
13-15 High Street
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1DP
Tel: 0117 986 9555
Fax: 0117 986 8680
enquiries@richmonssolicitorsco.uk
Jacqui Fulton
Giselle Robinson Solicitors
Inderjit Gill
Jacksons Specialist Equine Solicitor
Represented Gaynor Goodall in an accident on a bridleway on Tameside County Court 01 February 2010
Knights Solicitors
Tunbridge Wells
Tel: 01892 537311
www.knights-solicitors.co.uk
Work with GRC Commercial Bailiffs
Senior partner very good on equine matters
Horse Solicitor
Tel: 01446 794 196
info@horsesolicitor.co.uk
www.horsesolicitor.com
www.laytons.com
Mary Ann Reay Charles or Chris Shaw
Shaw and Co Solicitors
Equine Law Specialists
Tel: 0800 019 1248
info@shawandco.com
www.shawandco.com
Arnold Thomson
205 Watling Street West
Towcester
Northants
NN12 6BX
Tel: 01327 350266
Fax: 01327 353567
www.arnoldthomson.com
enquiries@arnoldthomson.com
Tozers www.tozers.co.uk
Eleanor Temple Barrister from Kings Chambers in Leeds
Tel: 0113 242 1123
www.kingschambers.com
Thank you for this so I do carry on with finding the vets
Hi oh no I don’t want to fretting about it it was a private sale he was a lightly backed stated in his advert she had him on a trail at my farm for just short of a month she was offered to have him vetted she turned it down I have never once seen the pony lame sick or sorry he never needed a vet unlike my other horse ? but they are my babies and want for nothing I have multiple sclerosis that why I had to let him go because he needed a job anyway so the lady txt me saying she’s had a vet and he has laxity of the hock I said are you sure because he’s never shown any signs she got nasty saying I knew about it I asked for the vets details because I couldn’t get my head around it rung the vets she said he was lame on the day could be possible laxity of the hock but wouldn’t know until he had a full lameness test and X-rays so I told the woman take me to court if she still felt this way then I got a court letter threw with all the claimants statements and we had a dispute resolution hearing date it was over the phone judge said the pony is not fit for purpose he was sold as a ridden pony (he wasn’t) but I knew the buyer wanted to eventually ride him and I have to either give a full refund or pay half the vets to see if he actually has laxity of the hock and not fit for purposeThis has been bugging me all night. I hate giving bad advice ?
I don't see any way that a judge can have used the words "fit for purpose" in that court hearing unless the judge is a fool or the buyer has managed to convince the judge that this was a business sale.
Is there more to this than you are telling us Jo? Have you ever sold any other horses? Do you run a horse related business?
.
Thank you so much it’s the pony I feel for I really did think I found him the most perfect HomeYou are not being a pain, it sounds like a horrible situation to find yourself in. I have no experience to help but I really hope someone can help you resolve things x
Thank you so much it’s the pony I feel for I really did think I found him the most perfect Home
Hi oh no I don’t want to fretting about it it was a private sale he was a lightly backed stated in his advert she had him on a trail at my farm for just short of a month she was offered to have him vetted she turned it down I have never once seen the pony lame sick or sorry he never needed a vet unlike my other horse ? but they are my babies and want for nothing I have multiple sclerosis that why I had to let him go because he needed a job anyway so the lady txt me saying she’s had a vet and he has laxity of the hock I said are you sure because he’s never shown any signs she got nasty saying I knew about it I asked for the vets details because I couldn’t get my head around it rung the vets she said he was lame on the day could be possible laxity of the hock but wouldn’t know until he had a full lameness test and X-rays so I told the woman take me to court if she still felt this way then I got a court letter threw with all the claimants statements and we had a dispute resolution hearing date it was over the phone judge said the pony is not fit for purpose he was sold as a ridden pony (he wasn’t) but I knew the buyer wanted to eventually ride him and I have to either give a full refund or pay half the vets to see if he actually has laxity of the hock and not fit for purpose
Sorry I’m a pain I’m just totally confused by it all