Tempi
Well-Known Member
Mum and i were having a heated debate last night about the point of competing someones horse for them.
Mum thinks its pointless and cant understand why people would want to ride someone elses horse, after all theres no real sense of achievement.
My point was that when you ride for an owner you dont have all the bills that go with it, and you can still get a sense of achievement on someone elses horse.
This whole thing was sparked by the article about Carl and Lecantos in this weeks H&H and how Lecantos is owner by Sasha Stewart. Mum dosent see why someone would by a horse, only to have it ridden by someone else - i also dont see why people do that either. Why buy a horse in the first place if you arent going to ride it? I know Sasha will eventually compete Lecantos, but alot of other owners never ride or compete thier horses.
views please
Mum thinks its pointless and cant understand why people would want to ride someone elses horse, after all theres no real sense of achievement.
My point was that when you ride for an owner you dont have all the bills that go with it, and you can still get a sense of achievement on someone elses horse.
This whole thing was sparked by the article about Carl and Lecantos in this weeks H&H and how Lecantos is owner by Sasha Stewart. Mum dosent see why someone would by a horse, only to have it ridden by someone else - i also dont see why people do that either. Why buy a horse in the first place if you arent going to ride it? I know Sasha will eventually compete Lecantos, but alot of other owners never ride or compete thier horses.
views please