cp1980
Well-Known Member
Doing some maths to work out which of the following combos would represent the best value for money, both in terms of cost to buy and cost to run (also factoring practicallity)
Three typical options:
A 4x4 or other large car and trailer
Pros: Easy to buy, trailer is cheap to maintain, only need one car
Cons: Have to take trailer (B1+E) licence; 4x4 is costly as everyday car; no living (unless the 4x4 is actually a van)
A 3.5 tonne van horsebox
Pros: No need for additional licence; easy to drive and maintain; second car could be small
Cons: Need a second car, attract a premium so can be costly to buy; no living (but could pull a caravan)
7.5 tonne horsebox
Pros: Very practical if correctly built, second car could be small, can have living.
Cons: Need to get a C1 licence, need to run a second car, parts can be costly, expensive to buy
What do you have? Do you still like your combination?
Three typical options:
A 4x4 or other large car and trailer
Pros: Easy to buy, trailer is cheap to maintain, only need one car
Cons: Have to take trailer (B1+E) licence; 4x4 is costly as everyday car; no living (unless the 4x4 is actually a van)
A 3.5 tonne van horsebox
Pros: No need for additional licence; easy to drive and maintain; second car could be small
Cons: Need a second car, attract a premium so can be costly to buy; no living (but could pull a caravan)
7.5 tonne horsebox
Pros: Very practical if correctly built, second car could be small, can have living.
Cons: Need to get a C1 licence, need to run a second car, parts can be costly, expensive to buy
What do you have? Do you still like your combination?