Why? on first glance i would say yess but if you look at the white face markings on horse 2 there is not enough white covering the bottom of the nose on the other side i could be wrong
Between horse 1 and 2 no way they are totally different. White markings ( stripe) is totally different in the second horse it veers to the right nostril and on horse 1 it does not. Other differences are subtle and hard to distinguish due to angles of the photos being different but even so I would still state my life on it that they are not both the same horse.
Cazx
No i don't think it's same horse cos of different markings but however i do notice similarites in bone structure, shapes of their heads... they could be related???
i think it could be, if you look very closely between pic 1 and 2, the markings on the nose are very simular, horses markings can change very slightly with age (blazes can look whiter etc) and a different time of the year coats change colour so the blaze could be whiter on the end of the nose in the second pic due to time of the year etc. also look just under his forelock, the blaze moves to the right in both pictures.