Daily Mail looking to cause trouble for rescues.

Dobiegirl

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 February 2011
Messages
6,975
Location
Wildest Somerset
Visit site
[h=5]Dogs Today Magazine shared Wood Green Animal Shelters's photo.
[/h][h=5]After the tragic story of little Lexy last week, the Daily Mail are trying to pull together a follow up story about other rescue dogs that may have bitten people.
They have contacted this magazine and also Wood Green to help them find case histories. We expect other people will have had these calls, too.
Wood Green's response was to ask people on their timeline to share their stories of rescue dogs and how much people love their dogs and value their friendship.
Last week, when the first call came in to us from the journalist, we encouraged the paper to contact fatal dog bite expert vet Kendal Shepherd who knows probably more than about tragedies like these. She is calling for proper forensic research after incidents so we can hopefully learn more and prevent further tragedies.
We also encouraged the journalist to contact www.familypaws.comabout their important Dogs and Storks work....See more
[/h]
Wood Green Animal Shelters
Charity Organisation · 29,068 likes










As far as I know this was the first fatal attack caused by a rescue dog even though it wasnt a proper rescue, when you think of the thousands of dogs that are happily rehomed every year and are good citizens. I know its the Daily Fail but I think it will drive people away from rescue dogs and buying more puppies from puppy farmers, this could do for pedigree dogs what the tv programme Pedigree Dogs Exposed did for pedigree dogs.
 
I think it's appalling to present one side of the story when it comes to rescue dogs. It's a difficult process in general and doesn't need to be made more difficult.

Instead, why don't they do a piece on responsible dog ownership regardless of where the dog comes from? Oh yes, because it wouldn't allow screeching and baying for blood by the readership.
 
My Dog is a rescue and we has some moments were i was expecting her to react.. never has done! shes soo placid, i'm still angry at the fact they blamed the wrong breed of dog!!

When i read the articles that littered around in the morning they couldn't wait to blame the mastiffs and have them added to the dangerous dog list and it was the wrong dog!!! Livid... if your gonna print wouldn't you check you had all the correct details before jumping on the 'ban the breed' wagon...
 
Last edited:
If they looked at figures properly they will find its a very small percentage of rescue dogs that have bitten let alone killed but that doesn't matter to the media. They only want the depressing news

Are there really figures that record where a dog that has bitten has come from? Who compiles them? I was always under the impression that statistics about dog bites were mainly recorded by hospitals and focused on the people rather than the dogs.
 
Are there really figures that record where a dog that has bitten has come from? Who compiles them? I was always under the impression that statistics about dog bites were mainly recorded by hospitals and focused on the people rather than the dogs.

your probably I just trying to say how the percentage of dog bites in rescue dogs is low. unfortunately I'm not always good with my words
 
I don't think there's much doubt that a rescue dog MAY be unreliable with some people (as in not ALL rescue dogs, but ...) I have two rescues: 1 is a Springer who came from NW Springer Rescue and they were a bit reluctant to let me have him as he'd shown signs of aggression - at 8 months!!! He'd been a home alone dog - and suffered nervous aggression and seperation anxiety! He DOES bite strangers given half a chance - but is 101% with my husband and me. We tried and tried - but he was entrenched - and he wasn't going to change - so we manage him with considerable care. The 2nd is a VERY cute JRxYorkshire terrier - he dislikes small children considerably! He was considered a naughty puppy by his former owners (what the hell could they expect!!) so he was locked in their coal shed for 23 hours a day - then let out to play with the (young) kids! So he bit them! I won't let him near small children - but he's 100% with anyone with half a brain!

BUT - to take a great big bull mastiff type into a flat was stupid enough - with a young child ....... the people who allowed them to take him should be banned frm rehoming work!
 
For perhaps the gazillionth time, it wasn't a rescue or rehoming centre. The kennel was contracted by the council to hold/imPOUND stray or unwanted dogs. It was essentially a council pound.
Council run pounds do not do homecheck/have oodles of volunteers to assess and proof each dog etc. You pay your money to cover vaccs, chips and sometimes neutering, and you take your chance with the dog that you see in front of you.
 
From what I read not only was the dog from a dog pound, but the Mother was in a housing association flat that did not allow dogs to be kept in the flats. I have not seen any explanation as to why the housing association rules were being ignored.
 
Top