Daily Mail - Lush?!?!

L

loopyloop

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 November 2007
Messages
964
Location
leics
Visit site
Just come across this on the DM website, not sure if it has already been posted?!?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...g-campaign.html

I'm not condoning the poor behavior detailed in the article but it tickled me to read the part about the keep hunting posters stuck on promotional boards - pictures featured on HHO!
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
I wish people would listen to the Countryside Alliance and what they have released as the pro hunt are making it worse by doing these things
crazy.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

ITA .
Yet again , I have the feeling that the minority is giving the majority a very bad name
crazy.gif
 
That's exactly it Curdog! The majority are trying to get their point put across in the correct manner but it's those over the top reactions giving the rest a bad name and adding fuel to the fire in regards to those that hunt.
 
Exactly and its saddening because the majority of hunt supporters are going through the right channels to get there opinions and voices heard!

Again , it just makes us all look like thugs that can't abide within the law or form an argument without violence/threats!

I am sure the sabs are having a field day and enjoying every little piece of negative media hunt supporters are getting especially with the season officially kicking off over the next few weeks!
frown.gif
 
See this is what I mean.

Now I kinda feel for you guy's (I am anti) I support the ban on foxhunting and I support Lush in their campaign. And I feel that all those dodgy so and so's you have come across whilst out hunting, havn't been the good guy's who want to 'peacefully' film what is going on - and this is who Lush want to support. Everyone you come across hasn't been bad, so don't put them all under the same group.

Now here, some idiots are making the hunting community look bad and making some people take the same view you as lot on the HSA. We know they are not all bad, but those dodgy ones now breaking the law are not helping and if anything are making the Jo public be more against hunting and supporting Lush, as it appears because of their tactics.. !

Do you see my point! (I often don't come across the way I indend to)
xxx
 
Russ, please don't be niave. I'm neither pro or anti, but the HSA support and liaise with dangerous Sabs - that is a fact.

Why not put the money to a wildlife organisation or something. Oh yeah, that wouldn't cause as much of an uproar would it?
 
I know what you mean! I don't think they want to cause an uproar but I do think they should of thought about it a bit more and could of got more support via the LACS - It's such a shame though when some ruin it for all.

xx
 
Now if I was a sab wanting to stir up trouble for hunt supporters I would ring Lush stores threatening "trouble" in the name of the CA etc or wreck displays and say I was pro hunt - generates a lot of adverse publicity for hunt supporters...... Just a thought. After all, isn't that what sabs are supposedly doing - laying false trails?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top