lifeslemons
Well-Known Member
I'm no expert on dressage and don't follow form religiously, but I was very surprised for the reasons he gives in this weeks H+H as to why Jane Gregory was chosen, and not Anna Ross-Daivs.
Mainly he seems to say that Jane is a better bet because she went to Atlanta. Am I the only one to think this is a stupid reason?! Yes of course team experience is invaluable, but Anna was best at the Euros last year and has much more RECENT international experience.
He also says that Anna's scores are inconsistant, but she is far more capable of getting 70% on a good day. Surely they will not get that bronze if they dont takes such risks??
I probably dont know what I'm talking about, but would have loved to have seen her there! Maybe there are some politics behind the decision (not even the reserve
)
Mainly he seems to say that Jane is a better bet because she went to Atlanta. Am I the only one to think this is a stupid reason?! Yes of course team experience is invaluable, but Anna was best at the Euros last year and has much more RECENT international experience.
He also says that Anna's scores are inconsistant, but she is far more capable of getting 70% on a good day. Surely they will not get that bronze if they dont takes such risks??
I probably dont know what I'm talking about, but would have loved to have seen her there! Maybe there are some politics behind the decision (not even the reserve