Pearlsacarolsinger
Up in the clouds
The random flares of temper sound horribly like a brain tumour, which are horribly painful and frightening for tre sufferer in people.
I have heard of them causing wild outbursts in horses, and they're generally only found PM.
I would PTS if I could; would the vet sign off for colic or a sudden injury? Surely there must be some provision for simply worn out old horses who aren't ill but failing?
Keeping him sounds cruel and dangerous, I'm afraid.
The vet is perfectly legally able to pts a horse at the owner's request. Unless the owner is trying to claim fraudulently on the insurance, there is no need to sign off for colic or anything else. Apart from anything else, who is going to ask? Some vets might question euthanising an apparently sound, healthy horse but in this case the owner's vet is perfectly well aware of the issues
[Quote = Tiddlypom] Along with everyone else, I agree that PTS is the only option left, but I too am concerned about involving a vet in what could be a career ending incident if he gets caught out. But if he can genuinely certify that the horse is often in distress, even if no physical cause can be found, then hopefully he can do the deed legimately.
Gets caught out by whom? At first i thought you meant danger of injury to the vet, which sounds as if it could be a real possibility but then realised that you didn't mean that.
Last edited: