Orangehorse
Well-Known Member
This is a really good discussion, thank goodness I don't run a livery yard. As a bystander, I think that the field fences and stables, yard area, etc should be in good repair and fit for purpose, to use that over-used phrase.
A yard owner is in business to provide safe and suitable premises and routine maintenace should be accepted (many farmers who started up livery yards admitted that they hadn't realised how much time they would spend fencing!).
But I think if your horse is a persistant offender and causes more damage that could be regarded as "wear and tear" then the owner should be held responsible. A horse bolting and going through a gate is not normal! Nor is a horse that constantly kicks, breaks fencing and is a destructive force normal wear and tear. I think livery yard owners should accept that horses chew fences - I see mine at home with a wiggly rail where it has been chewed, although not lately.
As for the OP and the collapsing wall - as the owner I would be annoyed that the wall was in such a state that it collapsed, so although apologetic, I don't think that I would pay and her reaction to leave with a month's livery paid in lieu is very fair. If the YO doesn't like it, then where was the contract that the horse owner should have had to set out all the conditions?
A yard owner is in business to provide safe and suitable premises and routine maintenace should be accepted (many farmers who started up livery yards admitted that they hadn't realised how much time they would spend fencing!).
But I think if your horse is a persistant offender and causes more damage that could be regarded as "wear and tear" then the owner should be held responsible. A horse bolting and going through a gate is not normal! Nor is a horse that constantly kicks, breaks fencing and is a destructive force normal wear and tear. I think livery yard owners should accept that horses chew fences - I see mine at home with a wiggly rail where it has been chewed, although not lately.
As for the OP and the collapsing wall - as the owner I would be annoyed that the wall was in such a state that it collapsed, so although apologetic, I don't think that I would pay and her reaction to leave with a month's livery paid in lieu is very fair. If the YO doesn't like it, then where was the contract that the horse owner should have had to set out all the conditions?