WrongLeg
Well-Known Member
People round me who have only kept natives call my native ‘sharp’: they don’t know the meaning of the word.I do think there's a massive problem with the competitiveness of equestrianism now. I'm not sure if that's your point, but I'm basing this off your second sentence.
So many people seem to want a big, flash horse to move up the levels, and big, flash horses these days are often a very different kettle of fish to ride and handle. I'm not sure that's good for horses or owners. I have a lot of concerns about high end sport horse breeding (in terms of both soundness and temperament), but when you couple that with a "normal" budget, it can get disastrous for horse and rider really quickly.
I think if a lot of people were more sensible in their requirements, and more old fashioned horses were available, the lower training budgets would be less of an issue. I've backed and broken a fair few native types, but I would need serious professional help, and a much larger budget, with a lot of modern warmblood types (I mean, I'd need a rider - I couldn't ride one side of one probably!). That's not to say that cobs and natives are always easy and warmbloods are always sharp, but there are general trends, and a sharp native is unlikely to be on the same scale as a sharp sports horse.
How horses are kept whilst being backed makes a difference - natives who are field-kept and youngsters stabled for the 1st time can’t really be compared.