mightymammoth
Well-Known Member
post the thread then
Personally wouldnt bother with RSPCA, they arent worth the paper the letterhead is on, and WHW cant act if RSPCA have already been informed.....so go for WHW 1st. They are brilliant, really quick and will keep you informed of any action or update on the case unlike RSPCA.
They also have an email facility, if you cant or dont want to call.... I emailed because I was so emotional I didnt want to cloud the first conversation with my *colourful* language or by crying! I wanted them to have as many facts as I had in black and white so that they could investigate before I spoke to them.
Good luck xx[/QUOTE
Feel I have to say something to this. WHW can and do act despite whether the RSPCA are involved or have been called already. I think where you are getting confused is that WHW don't prosecute whereas the RSPCA do. WHW often help RSPCA in prosecutions by providing transport/boarding and statements etc.
I think people need to remember the Amersham case before they go criticising the RSPCA too much. I bet nobody has got any idea how many millions that cost the RSPCA to investigate and prosecute.
they are not open until tommorow
this is the thread i found
http://origin-forums.horseandhound.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=512936&page=10
they are not open until tommorow
this is the thread i found
http://origin-forums.horseandhound.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=512936&page=10
Personally wouldnt bother with RSPCA, they arent worth the paper the letterhead is on, and WHW cant act if RSPCA have already been informed.....so go for WHW 1st. They are brilliant, really quick and will keep you informed of any action or update on the case unlike RSPCA.
They also have an email facility, if you cant or dont want to call.... I emailed because I was so emotional I didnt want to cloud the first conversation with my *colourful* language or by crying! I wanted them to have as many facts as I had in black and white so that they could investigate before I spoke to them.
Good luck xx[/QUOTE
Feel I have to say something to this. WHW can and do act despite whether the RSPCA are involved or have been called already. I think where you are getting confused is that WHW don't prosecute whereas the RSPCA do. WHW often help RSPCA in prosecutions by providing transport/boarding and statements etc.
I think people need to remember the Amersham case before they go criticising the RSPCA too much. I bet nobody has got any idea how many millions that cost the RSPCA to investigate and prosecute.
It will have cost probally well over one hundred thousand pounds I would think at a guess .
And that's without the legal costs, the sums are eye watering.
The welfare agencies in the area I worked in all worked together very well we had different strengths and there are huge problems out there it makes sense to co-operate.
I would def report it again. The more reports made the more plausable the reports will look.
I found this place on fb at the time of the original post and raised the concerning issues with the owner of the place. She wasn't willing to take any criticism and has all the hallmarks of a hoarder and potential welfare disaster. She wouldn't take on board any advice and I think the welfare organisations will be met with a very obstinate woman. She does by the looks of things have a history of ill and dying horses, most usually through unexplained colic. However, she also has fields full of acorns which are accessible to the horses too.
have you seen this place then? are the acorns harmful? sorry i dont know anything about horses... i did see alot of ragwart in the fiedls at the end of the summer which i believe can be harmful, should i mention these things also when i call?
have you seen this place then? are the acorns harmful? sorry i dont know anything about horses... i did see alot of ragwart in the fiedls at the end of the summer which i believe can be harmful, should i mention these things also when i call?