skewbaldpony
Well-Known Member
I've noticed a few posts on here really slating people who keep horses and don't 'do' anything with them.
Which raises an interesting point -
Theoretically, if someone had a horse, nothing wrong with the horse, the horse is adequately kept at grass, it's not overweight or underweight, it's feet are trimmed, it's wormed if necessary, it has company, and seems happy.
Why would it need to do anything? Surely that's a human construct? Why can't the horse just be a horse?
Just interested, this is a hypothetical question, by the way, so no hate mail please!
Which raises an interesting point -
Theoretically, if someone had a horse, nothing wrong with the horse, the horse is adequately kept at grass, it's not overweight or underweight, it's feet are trimmed, it's wormed if necessary, it has company, and seems happy.
Why would it need to do anything? Surely that's a human construct? Why can't the horse just be a horse?
Just interested, this is a hypothetical question, by the way, so no hate mail please!