rowan666
Well-Known Member
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-35644209
what are your thoughts on this?
what are your thoughts on this?
Are they seriously trying to say that at 3am there was that much traffic on the road that the dog was that big a danger?? Just appalling regardless
applecart look at the time of the incident, I doubt a rolling block would have been necessary at 3am! Presumably it belonged to the local hunt - no mention of trying to contact them or an experienced dog handler
I would rather a dog was run over than a human get injured or killed in a traffic accident. We weren't there but I would think there was a very good reason why they had to take this course of action.
Presumably the police are exempt from any animal welfare laws (imagine what they'd do to Jo Public if he did this), and spend the rest of their time chasing around trying to run down loose deer, badgers and foxes.
My thoughts were they did exactly the right thing, had it been a horse or any other large livestock then im sure they would have shot it as they did to two horses a while ago when they were loose on roads, but this was probably the quickest, reliable way of ensuring a quick death, im sure in the event that it had not been killed outright then they would have shot it to prevent further suffering, or got it straight to a vet.
Yes it was early hours but a car and lorry had already swerved to avoid the dog and there were probably many more lorries on the road as they try to make the journeys by night and miss rush hour. It is so easy to turn over a lorry or jackknife one when swerving at speed, imagine the damage this could cause.
It only takes thinking of the alternate headline for this to prove the actions to be the right ones.
5 Vehicle pile up as lorry swerves to avoid loose dog.
I would hate to be the owner of a dog causing that and would much rather the police had dispatched it safely.
I can't believe this is up for debate!
What if the dog had changed direction before impact, if they hadn't hit it square etc?
Not all police carry guns, so they would have had to wait for the appropriate response unit to finish it off
Fair enough human lives over dogs but I just can't believe there were no alternatives to running the dog over
Yes there was that risk, they probably had tried alternatives, but as you very rightly pointed out it was 3am how long would it have taken to get vet/gun unit/dog unit/rspca/local hunt there any one of them could easily have taken longer than an hour and what happens in the mean time i'm sure the dog isn't just going to sit and wait.
I would also like to ask what you would do should you hit an animal with your car that you do not kill.
I would rather a dog was run over than a human get injured or killed in a traffic accident. We weren't there but I would think there was a very good reason why they had to take this course of action.
Having picked up an injured duck only a few weeks ago the answer to that one was take it swiftly to someone that could despatch it more swiftly than I. For a dog the nearest vet of course, but then I wouldn't have been aiming at it in the first place and that is my objection!
But would you stop and pick up a duck on a busy duel carriageway, off course not as its to dangerous and could course a nasty accident like the dog. Thankfully nobody was seriously injured but it could have ended up that way very quickly. If the headline was different " 2 person lose life due to lose dog" this thread would be totally different and asking why the dog wasnt dealt with.
Don't tend to mow down animals on purpose really
I stopped on a busy B road near a staggered cross roads and was on the opposite side of the road so wasn't the simplest manouver. I've also seen people stop on the motorway and on dual carriageways to rescue animals in distress so yes I probably would stop. There are ways to do these things without risking life and limb or causing an accident. All of which is completely irrelevant in this case.
The facts as far as we know them are that the officers involved thought it was appropriate to pursue a dog down the road at high speed to run it over on the chance that they could hit it hard enough to kill it out right... seriously... you think that was the right thing to do?
Yes but what about the poor rabbit you could not avoid, or are you the swerve/screech to a halt one that causes the accidents.
My own answer if when I saw a pheasant hit by the vehicle in front and did not kill outright, I aimed for it and then turned round to ensure that it was dead.
Yes but what about the poor rabbit you could not avoid, or are you the swerve/screech to a halt one that causes the accidents.
My own answer if when I saw a pheasant hit by the vehicle in front and did not kill outright, I aimed for it and then turned round to ensure that it was dead.
I am always turning around in the road and going back to finish the job off, if there is a dying rabbit or bird. I hate the thought of something lying in the road suffering, waiting to die. And even if I see something squashed in the road I will run my tyre over it 'just in case'. My partner takes the mickey and says the rabbit is probably minding its own business and doing a spot of sunbathing and there I am ruthlessly mowing it down.
I saw a cat not long back been hit by a car and left. Was already dead, but hadn't been dead for long. Someone came out of their house having claimed to have seen it hit by someone that drove off. I scooped it onto one of those newspaper collection box lids which was on the verge by the house where it had been hit. Its bottom jaw was broken, other than that no marks on it. I put my finger on its eyeball but no reflex so knew it had gone. I was going to take it to the vets to see if it had a microchip but the lady who had come out said she thought she knew whose it was. This is the second time I've stopped for a cat shortly after it has been run over.
Its amazing how many people wouldn't stop when they see an animal in plight. I once saw a dog running along a verge with traffic whizzing past it. Managed to pull the car over, put on my hazard lights, and get in front of the dog which finally shuddered to a halt in my arms. Then I grabbed its collar and rang the number on the tag. Cars were driving past seeing me sat on the verge with a subdued dog and not even slowing down to ask if I wanted any help, or if I needed the vet (by this time it has gone into submissive mode lying on its back with its legs in the air so to those that didn't know any different it looked I had run over the dog).
I always have the numbers of the animal wildlife rescue associations in our area so that if I see a half dead badger (couldn't run that over) or a stag (we have plenty of those by us and I have nearly clipped one before now) then I can call them out to despatch said animal.
In light of this I would think it's sounding increasingly likely the dog was deliberatly run over soley in revenge for biting (which probobly only happened because it was scared anyway!)A few things to consider about this incident and the rights or wrongs of it...
A while back the same police force , in nearly the same stretch of road put in a rolling road block to stop traffic hitting a swan( could have been goose) ! This was in daylight time, so would have caused quite a Q.
They also tazered a sheep....
At 3 am that road is not at all busy, unless the Irish ferry has just docked, and it hadn't .. They just took the easy way out... It would only have taken one more traffic car to do a rolling stop of traffic,
I am of the opinion that they would have needed permission to "run it over" had they not killed it outright, and it was injured I do like to think they would have taken it to a vet... Of course human life comes before a dogs, but bear in mind that dog would have been so scared and confused, it was probably trying to find a way to get to a safe place, the full facts will come to light eventually , whose dog it was, was it from a hunt? Private owned? Lost? Or had it been abandoned on side of road.?