I'm sure we'll both be interested to see how it pans out.
Yes indeedy![]()
Although of course, while the horse (or bike) would get to the patient first, any patient who needed to have oxygen, defib etc would eventually need a vehicle to transport them out of the park. So either which way, you'd still need access for an ambulance.
When I fell off a couple of years ago out hacking, the fast response car couldnt find me, the ambulance couldnt find me and a helicopter was scrambled which *again* struggled to find me! I was in a clearing a little way off a rural lane that we access via bridlepaths which cross a golf course. It was a very inconvenient place to take a tumble!!
I think that in my situation, this would have been a good idea, as I would assume that the rider will know where the bridlepaths and things are to be able to get to someone quickly, and then contact the vehicles to let them know the situation etc.
I think the purpose is more to get a medic there as fast as possible who can get the casualty stabilised and then worry about transporting the person out.
Will be very interesting to see if its a success![]()
Sorry for your injuries.
I think your experience supports the point I was making to Spudlet though.
The point of this person is to get there quickly and offer support until the paramedics arrive - that is what first responders are meant to do, no matter what mode of transport they use![]()
This is true, but with a first responder present that time that it takes to get the vehicle there is less crucial (in some cases).
For example, to take HappyHacks fall (sorry HH!). On a cold, wet day, she could have been at risk of developing hypothermia. A first responder would have been able to lessen this risk by keeping HH warm and dry - therefore, the fact that it took the ambulance longer to get there would have been less crucial.
To take a hypothetical case - a person suffering with DIB could have oxygen or other appropriate assistance from the first responder, giving the patient a better chance of survival while waiting for the ambulance to arrive.
Whatever the first responder travels on or in, they are not going to be the ones that transport the patient, and in a country park there is only so much that can be done to allow ambulance access.
They are two different issues because paramedics and first responders are not the same thing. So calling this person a 'horse ambulance' is misleading, it is not his job to be an ambulance but to get to the scene as quickly as possible and offer assistance and support until either the situation is resolved or until the ambulance arrives. In this case a horse has clearly been judged the most efficient way to facilitate this. Not having visited the area and seen the terrain, I can't say whether or not this is true but I cannot imagine that this person or the local ambulance service will have made this decision on a whim.
Well, I ride out on Cannock Chase quite frequently, I might make it more frequent on viewing Mr BennettI have definately covered terrain that no quad bike could fit through. It is very popular with mountain bikers and walkers too. And they recently made a point that there are lots of 'holes' opening up on the land (old mine type things)
So I, for one think its a great idea, to be the first response in an incident, why wouldn't it be a good idea? Even if he has to leap off and throw his reins over the nearest tree branch.. although his horse could be trained as well as the ones you see in films which just stand there when the reins are dropped...
Well, I ride out on Cannock Chase quite frequently, I might make it more frequent on viewing Mr Bennett![]()