H_Venables
Well-Known Member
Right, I need opinions about my potential new share horse. Hes a 16.3hh Warmblood gelding, good allrounder moves nicely and prior to purchase by current did a fair bit of showjumping so Im told. I have not yet seen him jumped.
The conditions of the share are as follows:
£130/calendar month.
(Price includes livery/insurance/shoes and worming for equivalent of 2 days/week).
Riding twice a week and occasionally competing if fits in with owner.
If horse is ill/lame or if I am away, I still pay.
If I injure horse/damage equipment, I pay half/replace equipment.
All of the above Im quite happy about, other than thinking its a little pricy for twice a week.
What I am uncertain about is the timetable of the horses exercise and where the cash is going. I pay for Sunday and Thursday. The horse has been shared with owner for a while and now the old sharer is pregnant so she is riding less frequently and not doing as much. When I ask about the terms and conds, the owner said I would be the sole sharer, but mentioned the other old sharer was around but would be stopping soon.
To me, the horse is being paid for twice on a Sunday and I have no guarantee of when the ride of the horse will be solely mine on a Sunday. I just think its a little unfair for a horse that is worked most days to be ridden twice in a day and surely we should be splitting the cost of Sunday rather than both paying.
Am I being fussy or unreasonable?
The conditions of the share are as follows:
£130/calendar month.
(Price includes livery/insurance/shoes and worming for equivalent of 2 days/week).
Riding twice a week and occasionally competing if fits in with owner.
If horse is ill/lame or if I am away, I still pay.
If I injure horse/damage equipment, I pay half/replace equipment.
All of the above Im quite happy about, other than thinking its a little pricy for twice a week.
What I am uncertain about is the timetable of the horses exercise and where the cash is going. I pay for Sunday and Thursday. The horse has been shared with owner for a while and now the old sharer is pregnant so she is riding less frequently and not doing as much. When I ask about the terms and conds, the owner said I would be the sole sharer, but mentioned the other old sharer was around but would be stopping soon.
To me, the horse is being paid for twice on a Sunday and I have no guarantee of when the ride of the horse will be solely mine on a Sunday. I just think its a little unfair for a horse that is worked most days to be ridden twice in a day and surely we should be splitting the cost of Sunday rather than both paying.
Am I being fussy or unreasonable?