Caol Ila
Well-Known Member
Most academic journally title of a thead, ever....Sorry.
A friend of mine is in the market for a new horse, and she has seen one she likes, who is 14 and has been a broodmare at a well-regarded stud for her breed. She's had four foals between age four and thirteen/fourteen. The last pregnancy had complications, and they have decided to keep a daughter as a broodmare and sell the older mare, rather than put her through it again. She has been broke to ride and has hacked and shown and done things between foals.
Another friend (an experienced horse-person who has owned assorted geldings but never owned a mare) said she would not buy a mare who's had foals, her argument being that foaling is really hard on their body, and the mare might have damage to her pelvis and guts. When I looked at her and said, "What?" she added that Hermosa was probably fine because she was so young, and "everything probably bounced back into place." This was news to me. All else being above board, a few foals would not put me off, but what do I know?
I'm not worried about Hermosa and never was, but provided that the owner's story tracks (for the sake of argument, let's say it does), is there any reason to steer clear of a 14-year old mare who's had four foals? Barring serious complications, human women can usually go back to doing whatever it was they were doing before pregnancy, including pretty nails athletes. I would assume that a horse can as well, given we (generally) have far more complications with pregancy than they do. Am I right?
My friend who's looking for a horse is basically after a happy hacker, who can maybe do a wee bit of showing at a local level. It won't be running at Burghley or doing PSG dressage.
I guess what I am asking the forum is....if the horse is healthy and everything is kosher and all you wanted was a nice happy hacker, would you run away because she had a few foals?
A friend of mine is in the market for a new horse, and she has seen one she likes, who is 14 and has been a broodmare at a well-regarded stud for her breed. She's had four foals between age four and thirteen/fourteen. The last pregnancy had complications, and they have decided to keep a daughter as a broodmare and sell the older mare, rather than put her through it again. She has been broke to ride and has hacked and shown and done things between foals.
Another friend (an experienced horse-person who has owned assorted geldings but never owned a mare) said she would not buy a mare who's had foals, her argument being that foaling is really hard on their body, and the mare might have damage to her pelvis and guts. When I looked at her and said, "What?" she added that Hermosa was probably fine because she was so young, and "everything probably bounced back into place." This was news to me. All else being above board, a few foals would not put me off, but what do I know?
I'm not worried about Hermosa and never was, but provided that the owner's story tracks (for the sake of argument, let's say it does), is there any reason to steer clear of a 14-year old mare who's had four foals? Barring serious complications, human women can usually go back to doing whatever it was they were doing before pregnancy, including pretty nails athletes. I would assume that a horse can as well, given we (generally) have far more complications with pregancy than they do. Am I right?
My friend who's looking for a horse is basically after a happy hacker, who can maybe do a wee bit of showing at a local level. It won't be running at Burghley or doing PSG dressage.
I guess what I am asking the forum is....if the horse is healthy and everything is kosher and all you wanted was a nice happy hacker, would you run away because she had a few foals?
Last edited: