Alec Swan
...
James, it may well be that we can find common ground!
I wouldn't be in the least offended, by the complaints of those who will criticise the SFP. It's obscene, nothing more, or less, but the need for it has been brought about by inept government, and an even more shameful EU! It's another subject, for another time.
That there are MANY stud farms who do their level best for their owners, their horses, and ultimately their own families, has never been in question, and I have NEVER said otherwise. I have found a stud, just South of Newmarket, where I'm sending one mare to foal and be re-covered, and another for a straight forward AI. Having researched these particular people, extensively, I have heard nothing but good. It would be a just criticism to advise that I should have done research previously!!
I would suggest, as an example, that Touchwood, who has responded to this thread, has demonstrated an entirely fair and strait forward approach.
There is no question that ET is expensive, but is it, really? Take for example the thoughts of watertray53 and Chick1989. I'm staggered that no one has considered their thoughts before. I spend my life looking for fresh angles, and I can't imagine why I hadn't beaten them to it!
Let us for a moment consider that your one ambition was to breed a top class event horse. Let us now imagine that you one day received a 'phone call from the owners of, let's say Hedley Britannia. Continuing with this fantasy, what would your reaction be if they then said, "Would you like to make your own stallion choice, and have a foal from our mare?" I know what my reaction would be, and I'd pray for a filly!
Are the suggestions of the above two posters any different? That it would be fraught with problems, must be obvious. There would be a most certain need for clear and binding agreements, and that it all needs serious thought must be obvious. If we only rely upon breeding, or a retired mare, then surely the option of a successful, reasonably young and competing mare should be very attractive. The success rates from young mares are improved. You will have a mare who will hopefully have a strong dam line to support her, and with a careful and researched matching to the correct stallion, I would have thought that the costs weren't actually that bad, when compared with the cheaper option of a standard covering to a mare with no real record, and again, there is still the increased chance of failure.
The mare which has never competed will have had four or five foals before the eldest are able to demonstrate whether the choices are correct. The mare herself, though biddable and easily handled, may be an idiot under saddle. The Advanced mare, having succeeded, will have demonstrated that she has the ability to transfer those desirable qualities into her foal.
I accept that the mare which hasn't competed shouldn't be discarded, but I would also suggest that the failure rate of the offspring from these mares will be far higher than those from a mare which has mileage.
It would be helpful if those with a record of breeding successful competition horses would join in and offer their views. I, for one would be interested to hear the replies.
Alec.
I wouldn't be in the least offended, by the complaints of those who will criticise the SFP. It's obscene, nothing more, or less, but the need for it has been brought about by inept government, and an even more shameful EU! It's another subject, for another time.
That there are MANY stud farms who do their level best for their owners, their horses, and ultimately their own families, has never been in question, and I have NEVER said otherwise. I have found a stud, just South of Newmarket, where I'm sending one mare to foal and be re-covered, and another for a straight forward AI. Having researched these particular people, extensively, I have heard nothing but good. It would be a just criticism to advise that I should have done research previously!!
I would suggest, as an example, that Touchwood, who has responded to this thread, has demonstrated an entirely fair and strait forward approach.
There is no question that ET is expensive, but is it, really? Take for example the thoughts of watertray53 and Chick1989. I'm staggered that no one has considered their thoughts before. I spend my life looking for fresh angles, and I can't imagine why I hadn't beaten them to it!
Let us for a moment consider that your one ambition was to breed a top class event horse. Let us now imagine that you one day received a 'phone call from the owners of, let's say Hedley Britannia. Continuing with this fantasy, what would your reaction be if they then said, "Would you like to make your own stallion choice, and have a foal from our mare?" I know what my reaction would be, and I'd pray for a filly!
Are the suggestions of the above two posters any different? That it would be fraught with problems, must be obvious. There would be a most certain need for clear and binding agreements, and that it all needs serious thought must be obvious. If we only rely upon breeding, or a retired mare, then surely the option of a successful, reasonably young and competing mare should be very attractive. The success rates from young mares are improved. You will have a mare who will hopefully have a strong dam line to support her, and with a careful and researched matching to the correct stallion, I would have thought that the costs weren't actually that bad, when compared with the cheaper option of a standard covering to a mare with no real record, and again, there is still the increased chance of failure.
The mare which has never competed will have had four or five foals before the eldest are able to demonstrate whether the choices are correct. The mare herself, though biddable and easily handled, may be an idiot under saddle. The Advanced mare, having succeeded, will have demonstrated that she has the ability to transfer those desirable qualities into her foal.
I accept that the mare which hasn't competed shouldn't be discarded, but I would also suggest that the failure rate of the offspring from these mares will be far higher than those from a mare which has mileage.
It would be helpful if those with a record of breeding successful competition horses would join in and offer their views. I, for one would be interested to hear the replies.
Alec.