holeymoley
Well-Known Member
I could hit my head off a wall with this.
I have scrupulously read in to this in the hope to do the best for my horse who is insulin resistant. Three years ago he was on the verge of not making it through laminitis. He thankfully pulled through and had a major diet overhaul. Whilst on box rest I bought him very low sugar timothy hay and soaked it regardless. We moved yard and they could only supply meadow hay with ryegrass which I was instantly cautious about, however proceeded to get it analysed out of interest, which actually showed it to be very low in WSC & starch and ESC & starch. I fed this with no problems, but soaked for an hour each day to remove any dust. Unfortunately 2021 cut is much higher in both WSC & starch and ESC & starch. On speaking to the analysist company(very well known and thought of) they said that actually as my ESC & starch was at 10.2% combined they advised that it would still be fine to feed but to soak for at least 1 hour. The WSC & starch of it was up around 18%-20% (can't remember exactly). I have now read a post on social media from quite a popular nutritionist who claims that you must not go with the ESC & starch but the WSC & starch, in which case my hay is totally unsuitable. In doing my own research over the years, I have read that fructans do not affect the metabolically challenged horse as they are fermented i in the hind gut and therefore do not post a threat. Nutritionist claims that there is no research to support this.
To those that analyse and have metabollically challenged horses, what do you go by? I am normally the type that if it's working then leave well alone but this year my gelding has a slightly larger crest than last year, of which I was blaming the mild Winter for. Nothing has changed in his diet or routine in comparison to last year. I'm now beginning to think is it possibly because of this hay?
I have scrupulously read in to this in the hope to do the best for my horse who is insulin resistant. Three years ago he was on the verge of not making it through laminitis. He thankfully pulled through and had a major diet overhaul. Whilst on box rest I bought him very low sugar timothy hay and soaked it regardless. We moved yard and they could only supply meadow hay with ryegrass which I was instantly cautious about, however proceeded to get it analysed out of interest, which actually showed it to be very low in WSC & starch and ESC & starch. I fed this with no problems, but soaked for an hour each day to remove any dust. Unfortunately 2021 cut is much higher in both WSC & starch and ESC & starch. On speaking to the analysist company(very well known and thought of) they said that actually as my ESC & starch was at 10.2% combined they advised that it would still be fine to feed but to soak for at least 1 hour. The WSC & starch of it was up around 18%-20% (can't remember exactly). I have now read a post on social media from quite a popular nutritionist who claims that you must not go with the ESC & starch but the WSC & starch, in which case my hay is totally unsuitable. In doing my own research over the years, I have read that fructans do not affect the metabolically challenged horse as they are fermented i in the hind gut and therefore do not post a threat. Nutritionist claims that there is no research to support this.
To those that analyse and have metabollically challenged horses, what do you go by? I am normally the type that if it's working then leave well alone but this year my gelding has a slightly larger crest than last year, of which I was blaming the mild Winter for. Nothing has changed in his diet or routine in comparison to last year. I'm now beginning to think is it possibly because of this hay?