Amaranta
Well-Known Member
I do agree with you - but I do feel feed companies should shoulder some of the blame. They market inappropriate feeds to horse owners and blag some science to sell it.
The owners never know where to turn half the time...YOs and feed store owners are often the points of contact and advice!
Molasses in the guise of mogolo in lamintic feeds. Wheatfeed in laminitic feeds....I could go on and on.
I don't think the prevalence of ulcers is only dietary - but grains and conditioning feeds really won't be helping the situation.
I had a forage analysis done by Dodson and Horrell - who highlighted the problems with my forage and then on the next page tried to flog me some of their feeds that were totally inappropriate!
I really can't take the word of any nutritionist who is paid by a feed company. I would only consider using an independent with a good reputation.
I do agree, the feed companies should shoulder some of the blame but they are in the business of supply and demand and as long as people fail to grasp the basic concepts of feeding they will continue to supply them with what they ask for. There is one company who markets a best selling fibre feed for laminitics, it bears the Laminitis Trust's logo (don't start me on that one!), if you check the spec, there is NO probiotic and there is not enough biotin for even maintenance levels, absolutely drives me mad, this feed can be seen in every feed shop in the land and is a best seller! People think that feeding it will prevent and treat laminitis no matter what kind of grazing they have the poor unfortunate pony on and are always surprised when it goes down with laminitis.
I also agree that independent nutritionists are far less likely to give unbiased options, although a good company nutritionist should give advice that is not detrimental to your horse, there are good and bad within the industry I have no doubt.