stangs
Well-Known Member
The HHO article (‘Horses will die’ warning after UAE awarded world championship) makes for curious reading.
I couldn't fully understand Clean Endurance's criticism. I appreciate there have been big welfare problems in the UAE before, but surely the fact that the championships will be under FEI rules should prevent such issues from happening at the championships. Plus, their concern that it's not a venue that “more closely resembles the terrain and conditions the horses have been prepared for" - do people really train only on terrains that they’ll expect at championships? Besides, it doesn’t seem particularly inclusive to only host championships in landscapes not all riders have access to train on.
Am I missing something, or are these criticisms about the decision just politics?
(Also, ‘social license’ must be the new ’unprecedented’; absolutely everywhere with increasingly little meaning.)
I couldn't fully understand Clean Endurance's criticism. I appreciate there have been big welfare problems in the UAE before, but surely the fact that the championships will be under FEI rules should prevent such issues from happening at the championships. Plus, their concern that it's not a venue that “more closely resembles the terrain and conditions the horses have been prepared for" - do people really train only on terrains that they’ll expect at championships? Besides, it doesn’t seem particularly inclusive to only host championships in landscapes not all riders have access to train on.
Am I missing something, or are these criticisms about the decision just politics?
(Also, ‘social license’ must be the new ’unprecedented’; absolutely everywhere with increasingly little meaning.)