ihatework
Well-Known Member
OK, not wanting a debate on freezemarking or not - personally I have never had a horse done and have no qualms about that at all.
However I have a horse that is now fully retired and is just about to be moved to his retirement home, lovely big field with shelters and a couple of other knackered nags to keep him company.
Now this field isn't part of a yard and is boardered on both sides by roads so I have decided for the first time in my life it might be sensible to get this horse freezemarked as a deterrant (although I'm sure any theif would give him back the next day after realising they had stolen a crip
)
I've heard that it would be fairly easy to alter a standard freezemark if so desired? Don't know how true this is? So I was thinking it might be a better idea to just have him marked with a loss of use stamp instead - idea being that hopefully a theif would be more likely to avoid as more difficult to sell on?
Thoughts - standard freeze mark or an L ?
However I have a horse that is now fully retired and is just about to be moved to his retirement home, lovely big field with shelters and a couple of other knackered nags to keep him company.
Now this field isn't part of a yard and is boardered on both sides by roads so I have decided for the first time in my life it might be sensible to get this horse freezemarked as a deterrant (although I'm sure any theif would give him back the next day after realising they had stolen a crip
I've heard that it would be fairly easy to alter a standard freezemark if so desired? Don't know how true this is? So I was thinking it might be a better idea to just have him marked with a loss of use stamp instead - idea being that hopefully a theif would be more likely to avoid as more difficult to sell on?
Thoughts - standard freeze mark or an L ?