assuan
Well-Known Member
ok, i've searched, searched and searched some more on Lexis Library (a legal search website where you can find previous cases to find precedent, rulings etc etc) and I have not found a single case whereby someone admitted liability for the wording on their hi-viz.
did find an interesting case whereby a guy was riding in London, the horse bolted and knock someone over on the pavement who unfortunately died 3 days later in hospital. They found that the rider was not negligent and therefore innocent.
Also, found various cases of 'Car Insurance' companies vs. owners and horse insurance companies. They tend to go one of two ways, either 50/50 or car driver at fault. Hi-viz was mentioned, even the Warning and Caution ones, but didn't go against the rider/horse insurance.
did find an interesting case whereby a guy was riding in London, the horse bolted and knock someone over on the pavement who unfortunately died 3 days later in hospital. They found that the rider was not negligent and therefore innocent.
Also, found various cases of 'Car Insurance' companies vs. owners and horse insurance companies. They tend to go one of two ways, either 50/50 or car driver at fault. Hi-viz was mentioned, even the Warning and Caution ones, but didn't go against the rider/horse insurance.