teapot
Well-Known Member
I was reliably informed today by a friend who's going to be a volunteer at Greenwich that it'll be fine and it's looking good 
Agreed. I was there today and the ground conditions were perfect, even though there had been quite a lot of rain today.
I saw some site photos yesterday.
As well as the main arena, there are several warm up arenas (including indoor) that are all artificial surfaces.
My understanding is that the xc is the only event that will take place on grass.
Rather anticipated that would be the case and of course the Cross Country will be on grass, that's where the problem lies.
One simply cannot have horses travelling at speed in the current conditions, viz all the events currently being cancelled. Badminton as an example. It only needs for somebody to take a bad tumble and it is subsequently determinded that it was due to the going and all sorts of problems ensue.
Badminton was cancelled because it was under 2ft of water, not because it was slippy on top. There's a difference. And actually most events are being cancelled because courses/locations are waterlogged/too muddy to get lorries onto sites and the rest of the infrastructure. The reports from Burgham today say that whilst the course was slippy in parts, it actually rode incredibly well.
The Olympic xc will go ahead unless the FEI deem it unsafe (which is how it's worded in the official documentation). It's well draining soil on a pretty steep hill and I cannot believe they've not worked on the take off and landing points.
Anyone remember the Blenheim Euros running in HIDEOUS conditions?
Badminton was cancelled because it was under 2ft of water, not because it was slippy on top. There's a difference. And actually most events are being cancelled because courses/locations are waterlogged/too muddy to get lorries onto sites and the rest of the infrastructure. The reports from Burgham today say that whilst the course was slippy in parts, it actually rode incredibly well.
The Olympic xc will go ahead unless the FEI deem it unsafe (which is how it's worded in the official documentation). It's well draining soil on a pretty steep hill and I cannot believe they've not worked on the take off and landing points.
Anyone remember the Blenheim Euros running in HIDEOUS conditions?
Better to fall on soft ground at a slower speed than too fast on hard ground...
I've just got back from my VST and had a great walk round the XC course. I was amazed at how good the ground is BUT, (and this, to me, is a very big BUT) nothing has been on the fenced off course yet. What it will look like by the time a few big, studded hooves have galloped over it is totally another matter. Some of the areas that have been walked on by human feet and driven over by contractors' vehicles are pretty churned up.
One would hope so i.e. the FEI's position, however the current weather conditions are unprecedented and it is forecast to rain off and on, well into August, because of the unusual position of the Jet Stream over the North Atlantic.
What has to be remembered, many competitors and their horses from overseas, indeed beyond Europe are simply not familiar with these conditions.
One can work on take of and landing points until the cows come home, but if it is tipping down with rain constantly, it's a waste of time, notwithstanding the churning up of the course and the inevitable 'stickability' for riders apart from the first few?
I would disagree regarding overseas competitors being unfamiliar with these sorts of conditions. Certainly, those in North America, are accustomed to summer storms that make our rain look like a sprinkle. Yes, they do get summer floods. US government even runs a flood insurance scheme for home owners unable to find commercial insurance.
Asian riders will be accustomed to their own rainy/monsoon season, and the Australian/Kiwis are no strangers to spectacular weather.
Many of these riders train in the UK.
Faithkat, how many rows in each block?
Faithkat, how many rows in each block?