Auslander
Well-Known Member
I've noticed a bit of a furore on Facebook about the proposed inclusion of Devils Claw in the FEI Prohibited Substances list, and I don't really get why people are kicking up a fuss.
It is used for its (real or perceived) analgesic effect, and there is no other reason to feed it. Therefore, you would only feed it to a horse that you know to be in pain. If you know that a horse is in pain you shouldn't be competing it.
Simplistic, perhaps - but it's common sense, surely?
Just to add - I use a Harpagoside supplement from my vet, and have found it very effective on a horse with DJD in his hocks, who needs a bit more help in cold weather to get his motor running. I'm not arguing the toss about the substance itself - just the morality of using said substance to make a horse appear sound enough to go out and compete.
It is used for its (real or perceived) analgesic effect, and there is no other reason to feed it. Therefore, you would only feed it to a horse that you know to be in pain. If you know that a horse is in pain you shouldn't be competing it.
Simplistic, perhaps - but it's common sense, surely?
Just to add - I use a Harpagoside supplement from my vet, and have found it very effective on a horse with DJD in his hocks, who needs a bit more help in cold weather to get his motor running. I'm not arguing the toss about the substance itself - just the morality of using said substance to make a horse appear sound enough to go out and compete.
