lhotse
Well-Known Member
If the horse has always been blind to this degree, he is negligent for not spotting it. If the blindness has progressed, he was incorrect in his statement. Either way, by playing down its significance, he has influenced your buying decision.
But not the case if the horse has developed a different condition. Cataracts and uveitis (aka moonblindness) are two different conditions. It is quite possible that the uveitis has only occured in the last 10 months, or it is possible that the horse has had it for a number of years. It would also be possible that the cataracts are a result of damage within the eye due to the uveitis, but without a diagnosis of that condition at the time of vetting, and no previous history, the original vet would argue that the condition that has blinded the horse has occurred post vetting so is not his responsibility. It would be very difficult to prove that the horse had uveitis before the vetting.