FestiveFuzz
Well-Known Member
I read it as him refuting the "abusing a horse" thing. We have to remember this is a young girl whose life could be affected by this. I had a loan horse taken back when I was 15 unexpectedly (I'd done the work and the owner wanted the benefits!) and I still remember the pain. To have one taken by the SSPCA like this would be pretty horrible for an adult never mind a child.
See I read it as him refuting that the young girl had abused the horse, but by then we already had people saying that Humphrey had been taken due to his condition, lameness etc. and there was less focus on whether the girl had been witnessed abusing the horse. Surely as the owner you'd say something along the lines of the horse being well loved and cared for by both owner and the young girl rather than just refuting the girl's abuse of the horse? Or perhaps I'm just being a skeptical PR girl.